My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01295
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01295
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 11:21:09 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:19:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8030
Description
Section "D" General Correspondence - Other Organizations/Agencies (Alpha, not Basin Related)
State
CO
Date
3/20/1972
Author
Felix L. Sparks
Title
Statement of Felix L Sparks, Director, Colorado Water Conservation Board, before the WRC on the Proposed Principles and Standards for Planning Water and Related Land Resources
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />flood. The revised plan drastically reduces the previously planned <br /> <br />control of Bijou Creek floods. Since this revised plan cannot be <br /> <br />submitted to the Congress before next year, it will be subject to <br /> <br />another new and increased interest rate if the proposed principles <br /> <br />are adopted. And so ad infinitum. <br /> <br />It is most interesting to note that the proposed <br /> <br />principles apparently place no value on human life nor on human <br /> <br />suffering. Apparently these elements have no monetary value. <br /> <br />Having made these generalized unkind observations, I <br /> <br />would like to turn to a few more specific criticisms, including <br /> <br />the proposed seven percent discount rate. I do not purport to <br /> <br />fully understand the theoretical opportunity cost of federal invest- <br /> <br />ment as it relates to the discount rate, a rate actually described <br /> <br />in the principles as being at ten percent. This rate apparently is <br /> <br />borrowed from a study made by a Mr. J. A. Stockfisch in 1969 for' <br /> <br />the Institute for Defense Analyses. If in fact the average rate <br /> <br />of return on the investment of private capital is ten percent, <br /> <br />then the millions of Americans who annually invest their capital at <br /> <br />a lesser rate should be somewhat surprised. Why, for instance, <br /> <br />should Americans invest millions of dollars annually in treasury <br /> <br />bills which are currently returning less than four percent. Perhaps <br /> <br />all investors should hold out for a ten percent rate. or even <br /> <br />seven percent. The results on the American economy would be <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.