My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01268
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:12 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:18:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054.100
Description
Water Salvage - Water Salvage Study - HB 91-1154
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/6/1990
Author
Natural Resources La
Title
Background Documents and Information 1991 - Report on Irrigation Water Supply Organizations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0010?fi <br /> <br />3. District mana2ers and district boards. There was no cOncluding consensus on the <br /> <br />content of district managerlboard education. Generally, we need to provide the education or <br /> <br /> <br />expertise needed to knowledgeably address emerging issues, Earlier discussions focused on <br /> <br /> <br />educating the board about external political pressures. It was not clear whether the group <br /> <br /> <br />reached a consensus as to whether district managers and board members should be educated <br /> <br /> <br />about internal pressures as well. The suggested format is through reading materials, through <br /> <br /> <br />infiltration of district meetings, and through contact with district consulting engineers. Board <br /> <br /> <br />members and district managers are more likely to listen to suggestions made through or with <br /> <br /> <br />the approval of their consulting engineers, In the area of conservation, it was suggested that <br /> <br />regional workshops or conferences be held for the benefit of irrigation district management staff <br /> <br />with an agenda covering conservation issues, <br /> <br />4. The public, We need to consider public education because we cannot overlook the <br /> <br /> <br />long term effect of public awareness. Maybe special institutes should be set up to make people <br /> <br /> <br />more aware of the issues and the problem. Some districts are doing this now and. it could be <br /> <br />expanded.4 Public education may be promoted at various levels. We should incorporate this <br /> <br />type of education into schools at a very early grade level. <br /> <br />Although tbe public does not yet seem concerned about what irrigation districts can be <br /> <br /> <br />doing, we need to get through to the public on what the irrigations should be doing before we <br /> <br />get to the issue of improving district accountability. There is a public stirring on Some of these <br /> <br />issues and maybe it doesn't matter whether those within the district or outside tbe district care <br /> <br />-I There is.a district in Julesburg, Colorado that could provide an example. <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.