My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01268
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:12 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:18:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054.100
Description
Water Salvage - Water Salvage Study - HB 91-1154
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/6/1990
Author
Natural Resources La
Title
Background Documents and Information 1991 - Report on Irrigation Water Supply Organizations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,,0 0 0 9 8 0 <br /> <br />. The West has urbanized, resulting in the conversion of agricultural lands to other <br /> <br />~es; <br /> <br />. The growth in demand for municipal and industrial purposes places pressure on <br /> <br /> <br />agriculture which uses about 80 percent of the developed water in .the West; and <br /> <br /> <br />. Growing concern for water quality raises issues about agricultural practices that <br /> <br /> <br />produce pollution, <br /> <br />The focus in the following discussion is on four major issues facing irrigation districts <br /> <br /> <br />today: (1) reallocation; (2) conservation; (3) water quality; and (4) governance, These issues <br /> <br /> <br />are Dot meant to be exhaustive or independent. And while the issues are centered on tbe <br /> <br /> <br />problems facing these organizations, the workshop participants as a wbole and individually were <br /> <br /> <br />thinking and talking about botb short, or interim, and long term solutions to the problems <br /> <br /> <br />discussed, The Ford Foundation expressed interest in providing support for acti\~ties tbat might <br /> <br /> <br />be identified by the group to address problems facing irrigation districts today, <br /> <br />A theme that ran through all discussions was the idea of voluntary versus involuntary <br /> <br /> <br />solutions, Should we provide the . power and incentive to irrigation districts to adapt and <br /> <br /> <br />change, or should change be mandated through regulation, legislation or court decision, This <br /> <br /> <br />dichotomy cuts across all issues and is addressed in more detail in Part Five: Action Items, <br /> <br />Despite what, at times, may be phrased as a unified perspective, there was no single <br /> <br /> <br />group viewpoint or consensus on most issues discussed. Additionally, there were diverse views <br /> <br /> <br />on what thelOlutions should be. Most participants agreed that at least some transfers were <br /> <br /> <br />necessary to meet changing ~ter demands. However, some pan:icipants questioned whether <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.