My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01268
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:12 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:18:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054.100
Description
Water Salvage - Water Salvage Study - HB 91-1154
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/6/1990
Author
Natural Resources La
Title
Background Documents and Information 1991 - Report on Irrigation Water Supply Organizations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0013?~ <br /> <br />difference in achieving results. The structure of the board may be irrelevant to the types of <br /> <br />policies we would like to see carried out by the board. One example is. Kern County where the <br /> <br /> <br />county policy against transfer seemed to have more impact on district behavior than did the <br /> <br />structure of the board, Perhaps board make-up should be considered secondary to external <br /> <br /> <br />efforts to create opportunities or broaden existing opportunities for irrigation districts, <br /> <br />Maybe tbe first step in determining whetber external pressure would facilitate change is <br /> <br /> <br />to identify the source of pressures for district change, If the pressures for change are coming <br /> <br /> <br />from constituents within the district, then legislation may not be necessary and issues of <br /> <br /> <br />governance (trustee relationship) will be more important. If the pressures are coming from <br /> <br /> <br />outsiders who want tbe board to change, tben legislation is definitely needed, <br /> <br />A fundamental element of any water policy is what tbe districts are to do witb the <br /> <br /> <br />water. Enabling legislation should be examined to determine how legislative bodies deai with <br /> <br /> <br />the powers granted to or reserved from districts. To what extent do legislators dictate the <br /> <br />behavior of tbe districts, and do tbey understand tbey taD control the districts, <br /> <br />The concept of ratchet legislation may be adaptable to irrigation districts, Ai; <br /> <br /> <br />institutions or corporations get larger a greater responsibility is generally imposed by the public, <br /> <br /> <br />This is done now with cities where responsibilities are imposed Without the cities' taking any <br /> <br /> <br />affirmative action. At the same time,tbe cities are given more power as they get larger and <br /> <br /> <br />perhaps this idea could be applied to irrigation districts. There could be some process whereby <br /> <br /> <br />districts wou1d be subject to greater eXternal control as they grow larger or as they assume <br /> <br />more responsibility. One form of control may be authorizing ~ sf:8te representative to appoint a <br /> <br /> <br />4S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.