My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01268
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:12 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:18:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054.100
Description
Water Salvage - Water Salvage Study - HB 91-1154
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/6/1990
Author
Natural Resources La
Title
Background Documents and Information 1991 - Report on Irrigation Water Supply Organizations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />UUl.U':''':l <br /> <br />the west where this money would be a third level of agricultural subsidy (subsidy for water; <br /> <br /> <br />subsidy for crops; subsidy for water quality plans). The environmental community has been split <br /> <br />on the idea of subsidies. This became particularly evident when Congress tried to put a limit <br /> <br />on subsidies. Is this $5,000 grant really a subsidy or just tbe cost of economic planning? <br /> <br />Municipal members of irrigation districts are beginning to invest in programs aimed at <br /> <br />improving tbe quality of their water supply. In fact, municipal water users may prove to be a <br /> <br />major source of funding for the clean up of agriculturally induced water pollution, The city of <br /> <br />Boulder is con:;idering zoning section:; of a creek in order to improve water quality and <br /> <br />maintain the pbysical integrity of tbe riparian habitat In Utab municipalities are buying out <br /> <br />sbeep and cattle operations bigh in the watersbed in order to eliminate or control this land use <br /> <br />activity and tbus protect the quality of their water supply In the Utah example, the ultimate <br /> <br />user will pay tbe price of cleaner water. Similar efforts could be undertaken by municipal users <br /> <br />in the Bay-Delta area of California, It would likely be cheaper to buyout and retire tbe <br /> <br />agricultural lands causing tbe pollution rather than build neW water diversion/development <br /> <br />projects in more pristine areas higher up tbe stream so as to capture water above the area of <br /> <br />use and pollution, as is presently planned, However, this type of option has negative <br /> <br />consequences for instream flows and may not be politically popular in California or in other <br /> <br />states. <br /> <br />PART FOUR; IRRIGATION DISlRICIS AND ISSUES OF GOVERNANCE <br /> <br />What are the current procedures by which district board members are cbosen? How <br /> <br />. effective &Ie these procedures in ensuring a continuing board that is Imowledgeable about jssues <br />. . .. . <br /> <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.