My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01268
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:12 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:18:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054.100
Description
Water Salvage - Water Salvage Study - HB 91-1154
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/6/1990
Author
Natural Resources La
Title
Background Documents and Information 1991 - Report on Irrigation Water Supply Organizations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0010n <br /> <br />Additionally, there is authority under the Act for the imposition of a permit process to <br /> <br />control agricultural pollution, although the Act lacks enforcement. authority. H a permit <br /> <br /> <br />program is developed, consideration should be given to the potential difficulty in monitoring <br /> <br />discharges and enforcing regulatiom for agricultural pollution. <br /> <br />Use of Soil Conservation Service, One alternative suggested to regulation under the <br /> <br /> <br />Clean Water Act was the use of Soil Conservation Service (SCS) employees who are currently <br /> <br /> <br />located in every county across the country, They are able to work with individual farme~ and <br /> <br /> <br />could develop plans. Although the SCS has little funding today, they were originally a well- <br /> <br />funded agency with the capability to deal with issues such as comervatioD and water quality. In <br /> <br /> <br />a limited, low-key way, tbe agency is making progress today and still has expertise on tbese <br /> <br />issues, <br /> <br />The challenge may be in developing a way to bring together the SCS people together <br /> <br /> <br />with the irrigation district boards to develop management plam. Generally, these two groups <br /> <br /> <br />hold differeDt ideologies, The state of Oregon specifically gives the SCS greater influence in <br /> <br />irrigation district matte~, <br /> <br />The drafte~ of the' 1991 farm bill affirmed that the U.S. Department of Agriculture <br /> <br /> <br />(not the EPA) will have primacy over agricultural ground water quality. The bill may not lead <br /> <br /> <br />to actual changes, however, because it mandates research rather than implementation, The <br /> <br />drafters considered requiring farms with highly erodible lands to implement a plan. <br />Unfortunately, the current standards, developed by the Soil Conservation Service, are thought <br />by many to be too low to ensure protection of the water quality. Additionally, the SCS model <br />. . . . . , <br /> <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.