WSP01268 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

001009 pollution problem. An example is federal funding of improvements to local domestic water supply systell1S in the midwCst that has actuaUy reduced the level of concern with protecting the quality of the groundwater supplies. Bankin~ conserved water.. Irrigation districts could be permitted to bank: any water they conserve as is done in tbe case of the Snake River in Idaho. As with the regulatory requirements discussed below, a banking allowance would create a comfort factor for those district board members who may want to implement water conservation measures but do not want to take action contrary to tbe interests of their constitueDCY, Unlike regulatory requirements, a banking aUowance is a positive approach tbat may be more favorable to legislators, ImpOsition of a fee schedule. This really functions as an economic disincentive, because it would impose a tax or fee based on tbe level of irrigation practices that contribute to water quality degradation. However, it is an idea that legislators are beginning to choose over specific practice regulation. Iowa recently adopted a fee structure, along with establishing a center to conduct research in this area, The Iowa fee structure increases taxes on fertilizer and pesticide use, There was II specific legislative policy decision not to regulate, not to take any action except to impose finilDcial disincentives on the USe of fertilizers and pesticides, a tax on their use. Essentially this tax works to focus funcls" on fanners who are creating runoff problems: Internal incentives. Several irrigation districts are attempting to deal witb internal problems thlit may be addressed through measures that could improve water quality. Examples are the drainage problem in some California irrigation distric;ts th~t may be corrected through 31