My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01268
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:12 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:18:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054.100
Description
Water Salvage - Water Salvage Study - HB 91-1154
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/6/1990
Author
Natural Resources La
Title
Background Documents and Information 1991 - Report on Irrigation Water Supply Organizations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Ml00f. <br /> <br />PART TIIREE: IRRIGATION DlSTRlcrs AND WAlER QUALITY <br /> <br />The role of irrigation districts in implementing agriculturaJ:related water quality programs <br /> <br />bas not yet been well defined, While Congress bas taken a bands off approach to tbe <br /> <br />regulation of agricultural practices under tbe Clean Water Act, today's irrigation districts may <br /> <br />not have the expertise, the power or the incentive to address water quality concerns, And it <br /> <br />may be tbat they are not appropriate vehicles for band ling water quality clean up and control. <br /> <br />The following discussion coll.liders whether or not irrigation districts should be respoll.lible for <br /> <br />meeting water quality objectives, and if so, wbat steps sbould be taken to ensure that the <br /> <br />districts have the ability and the incentive to do so, <br /> <br />Irrigation District Responsibility for Agricultural Pollution Control <br /> <br />Historically, irrigation districts have stayed away from the regulation of irrigation <br /> <br />practices, Instead, they have relied on tbe federal government to step in when irrigation- <br /> <br />induced pollution reached a level that required clean up. There are several reasons, however, <br /> <br />for making these institutioll.l respoll.lible for water quality: (1) they control a major portion of <br /> <br />water that is used in agricultural practices that collectively are a principal source of water <br /> <br />pollution; (2) they are organized locally and along lines of natural watersheds; (3) they bring <br /> <br />year> of experience with water management on district lands; (4) they can bring "economies of <br /> <br />scale to pollution control; (5) tbey could develop sYstem-wide plall.l as tbey have done with <br /> <br />water distnbution systems;, (6) the costs of cleanup can be distributed equitably among users <br /> <br />within the district; and (7) districts can qualify for grants and other types of governmental aid to <br /> <br />assist them in canying Olit their pollution control programs, <br />. ' " <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.