My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01268
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:30:12 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:18:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054.100
Description
Water Salvage - Water Salvage Study - HB 91-1154
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/6/1990
Author
Natural Resources La
Title
Background Documents and Information 1991 - Report on Irrigation Water Supply Organizations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000395 <br /> <br />. A reduction in net diversional)' riiht ner unit Bcre of land irrillated. or the "net <br /> <br />reduction in water rer acre without a chanlle in croo yields." This may not necessarily be a <br /> <br />good working definition because 6tatistics have shown that the total yield or output in crops has <br /> <br />sometimes been highest in years of low precipitation. <br /> <br />. In terms of the life historv of water. water should be run throu~h as many uses as <br /> <br />possible before it is totallv consumed. <br /> <br />We ultimately must arbitrarily limit the definitioD of conservation because it means <br /> <br />several different things in different contelCtS, For the purposes of this discussion, the term <br /> <br />conservation will be limited to conservation that is relative to the application of water. <br /> <br />What Kinds of Conservation Do We Want to Encourage? <br /> <br />What is the purpose of coming up with a definition for conservation? Maybe we first <br /> <br />need to describe wbat we are talking about; maybe we need to limit the definition so that we <br /> <br />can get on to the topic of defining what it is that we want to encourage, <br /> <br />Generally, we are trying to encourage (1) cost-effective conservation; (2) <br /> <br />environmentally beneficial conservation; Bnd (3) conservation that is equitable to existing users, <br /> <br />More specifically, we want to encourage conservation that: <br /> <br />· reSults in net income. that stays tbe same or increases; <br /> <br />. results in no significant adverse third party impacts; . <br />" . <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.