WSP01233 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

002415 FRYINGPAN-AR~SAS PROJECT 33 "",c:~."~:'~/'>:,:";"~,a~ -'-'C.,".' , . <~~~!% /." ';" . $147,440,000. ; AJ:>out 25 percent of that cost would be for western s~~R.e\~~rlJStl.!;r~ and the transmountain tunnel. . The .annual opera- tIOn, mamtenance, and replacement expense IS estrmated to be $1,335,200. Annual orrera-. Feature Construction tion, ma ute.. cost nance, and replacement Dams and rf!servolrs~_'~__ _ ~ _ ~ ___ ~ ~ ___ _._ _ ~ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ ______ ____~ _ __ ___ ______ $64, 334,000 $30, 760 DfversIon canals Bnd condufts.._uunnn________________n________..__ 30, 499, 000 65. 870 Power features. ... _ ~_____ _____________________________._________________ 34, 021, 000 840,900 Munfcipal SUEP1y sys~mSM_hn-n--n--M---n--wnh------------------- 18,0.50,000 391, 680 Operation an maintenance during construct!oll_____n__un__n________ 036, 000 0 TotaL__ ___._ _ __.~ __ ~ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ w. _____ _ ~_____~~_ ~ ~ _.___ _~____ __ ____ 147,440,000 1,335, 200 . ..' -,' n-'., '," " '~~', "......' COST ALLOCATION 67. Construction costs have been allocated to the various project functions thro:Ugh use of the alternative justifiable expenditure 1h~thod, That method utilizes the estimated cost of the most econom- ical substitute, single-purpose facility which would provide benefits equivalent to t\:l.Ose accruing in a multiple-purpose development. The tentative allocation of construction costs and distribution of annual operation, maintenance, and replacement expenses are as follows: :r Annual oRem-- Function Oonstruction tion, ma ute- cost nance. and , replacement Irrlgatlon___..._ m.', _m._. ..__ ._.__00 ______n nn__ ......m.___._._._ $59,900,000 $76,080 Power _~ __ __ _~ _____ _ _ __ ~__ ______ _____ __ _ ___ __ _________.;_____~_______~___. 40,032, 000 854,050 Municipal water _.___. _,. ____.. _____ ~ _ ~ ~ _ _ _ ______. ______ ___~.-~-.- ~ _______ 29, 522. 000 405,070 Total returnable____.. _ .____ ____ __ _ ~ __. __ _ _ _ _. __ _ _ ____ _____..____ ___ 129,484,000 1,335,200 Flood control___ ______ __ __ ~_ _ ____... _ ___. _ _____ _ ___.. .______ ___ ~___ ______ 15,771,000 ~'l :Fish and wildlife. _... _' __....___ n___.... ._.. __.__ ___.. n ___n _._..__.n 2,179,000 1) Total nonretlirnable._ _~ _ ~.._ _n _ _ _ n_ u_ __~___ _. __ _ __un u______._ 17,956,000 " , ---------------.. Total costs.. ._. _._. n.... n. n __, n. _._ ._.n _.. __.... .___nn.. n. 147,440,000 , 1,'335,200 I Inoluded above. "'",..,,,.,....-,,l;i,l~ ;:ir;;'.~lt::{i.:~;~\;:;~J$~};;1~~{;il "J, : ~?: ,':"""_' ;':' ,,-,,~I,-"'~u~~ ~-~, -Pt<~ " PROJECT OPERATION AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT 68. The plan of operation calls for the formation of a water con- servancy district, under the Colorado Water Conservancy District Act of 1937, as llJllended, which would contract with the Government for payment of; project services performed in the collection, storage, regulation, and: release of water. Supplemental irrigation water at specified rates would be released to the district at reservoir outlets or possibly along the river, depending upon circumstances. The pro- posed basic ~ate of $3.60 pe~ acre-foot at the Pue~lo Reservoir has been determmed to be wlthm the payment capaClty of the water users. The district would assume responsibility for delivery of iITi. gation water. IT'his district, or possibly another entity, would con- tract with the p;overnment for Federal construction of the specific municipal water system, for district operation and maintenance of that system, and for delivery of water from the joint water supply ".' ~ , .i. iI'.~ ':;"':~,d;C_,;:..:._ /'