My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01231
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01231
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:29:56 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:16:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8443
Description
Narrows Unit
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/27/1976
Author
Jim Ohi
Title
Report to the Land Use Commission on the Narrows Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />~oGG <br /> <br />Report to LUC <br />Narrows pio)ect <br />Jim Ohi . <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />I would now like to make recommendations concerning further staff <br />action on the Narrows project. The staff requests authorization <br />from the Commission to conduct a comprehensive review of the project <br />for possible further action by the LUC. The staff requests this <br />authorization for the following reasons. <br /> <br />1. There remains a major question whether the actual benefits <br />of the project can justify the innundation of 3 communities <br />and the displacement of 150 farm families from a highly <br />productive farm valley. <br /> <br />2. The Board of County Commissioners of Morgan county has <br />requested the LUC to provide them with any information or <br />concerns that the LUC might have on the project on a <br />continuing basis to help them in their review of the <br />project. <br /> <br />3. The Regional Landowner's Group has requested the. <br />assistance of the LUC in evaluating the wisdom of <br />constructing the Narrows dam. <br /> <br />4. Both EPA and the State Engineer's office have found the <br />draft EIS to be inadequate and both recommend a more <br />through evaluation of the impacts of the project. <br /> <br />5. The project has significant, long-term land-use implica- <br />tions for northeast Colorado which deserve very close <br />scrutiny by state, federal and local agencies. <br /> <br />More specifically, the staff requests the Commission to authorize <br />an in-depth and comprehensive study of all aspects of the project <br />in cooperation with all interested federal, state, and local agencies <br />and the public. <br /> <br />Thank you. <br /> <br />JO/mad <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.