Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Sl ide IV-25 <br /> <br />Allocation - Classes of Customers <br /> <br />The classes of customers we propose to cons i der in the all ocat ion of re- <br />sources in the post 1989 market i ng peri od fall into four groups: proj ect <br />use loads; ex i st ing preference customers; new preference customers; and <br />finally, non-preference customers. Government loads could be mil itary or <br />Department of Energy needs while entities with renewable resources or <br />cogeneration might be any preference customer. We are interested in <br />encourag i ng the deve 1 opment of renewab 1 e resources and cogenerat ion and <br />are interested in interfacing with customers developing these resources in <br />such way as to enhance their development and utilization. <br /> <br />Slide IV-25 <br /> <br />Allocation - Alternatives <br /> <br />One of the determinations we must make along with the many other things <br />being considered is the establishment of the ground rules for allocating the <br />post B9 resources. For existing preference customers the allocation could <br />be based on the contract rate of delivery for long term firm power or long <br />term firm power plus peaking. An alternative would be to use customer <br />load, either historical or ,estimated future load. Allocations to new <br />preference customers could be 'based on either historical loads or future <br />estimated load; a special consideration might be given to entities utilizing <br />renewable resources or cogeneration. <br /> <br />Slide IV-27 <br /> <br />Allocation - New Customers <br /> <br />Comments from previous meetings indicated that there are some preference <br />entities who are not customers now who would like to contract for CRSP power <br />in the future. We have considered some alternatives for making power avail- <br />able for allocation to new customers or additional power available to exist- <br />ing customers such as Department of Energy loads. One possibility for cre- <br />at i ng a "resource poo 1" mi ght be to 1 imi t CRSP power to some percentage of <br />a customer's total loads based on CRSP power or based upon total Federal' <br />resources. Another might be to reduce the contract rate of del ivery of cus- <br />tomers with a large allocation of CRSP power by some fixed percentage, or we <br />might reduce the size of the market or use a combination of these methods. <br /> <br />Slide IV-2B <br /> <br />Contractual Arrangements <br /> <br />The contractual arrangements for the existing criteria provide that present <br />contracts will run through September 1989 with short term power being avail- <br />able seasonally or monthly. It also requires a notice five years prior to <br />contract expiration to reduce long term power or to substantially change the <br />amount of energy. <br /> <br />15 <br />