My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01201
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:29:44 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:15:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Marketing
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/10/1982
Author
WAPA
Title
Public Information Forum - Consolidated Power Marketing Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />generally in the 20-25 mill range and is sold to customers at the firm <br />energy rate - four mills per kilowatthour. An alternative would be to <br />continue this practice of purchasing firming energy, but to sell this <br />energy to customers at the average purchase cost. <br /> <br />Slide IV-16 <br /> <br />Project Generated Surplus <br /> <br />Another situation which could arise more frequently since the filling of <br />Lake Powe 11, is the avail ab il i ty of project generated s urp 1 us energy. At <br />present it is sold to customers at the CRSP firm energy rate. Alter- <br />nat i ves to th i s pract i ce wou 1 d be to se 11 it to customers at the average <br />value of the energy we are purchasing or to market this generation in the <br />fuel conservation program. <br /> <br />Sl ide IV-17 <br /> <br />Basis for Marketable Power <br /> <br />We indicated earlier that the basis for arrlvlng at the amount of marketable <br />power was the most adverse water condition for determination of marketable <br />capac ity and average water condit ion for determinat ion of marketab le energy. <br />However, some other basis could be used. We could consider using 90% proba- <br />bility hydro or some level other than most adverse. We could likewise con- <br />sider another basis for energy such as median water year energy, or limiting <br />energy sales each year to what the projects will actually produce each year. <br /> <br />Slide IV-18 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Delivery Conditions <br /> <br />Delivery conditions of the existing criteria provide that the delivery loca- <br />tion be at a designated or equivalent federal point of delivery or some <br />other point as mutually agreed and at not less than 115 kilovolts. Western <br />assumes cost of transmission and losses to the delivery points. <br /> <br />Slide IV-l9 <br /> <br />Delivery of Power Beyond Delivery Points <br /> <br />Beyond the del ivery point, the customer assumes all costs for losses and <br />for transmission service or facilities. <br /> <br />Slide IV-20 <br /> <br />Capacity and Energy Obligations - Factors to Consider <br /> <br />There are a number of factors we need to consider with regard to energy and <br />capacity obligations. These include requirements for pre-season and hourly <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.