My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01185
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:29:40 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:14:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.500.20.A
Description
Colorado River Operations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/15/1986
Author
UCRC
Title
Draft - Upper Colorado River Commission Action Related to Operation of the Colorado River Reservoir System
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the apportionments to the Lower Basin provided for in Article III (a) and (b) <br /> <br />of the Colorado River Compact and the entire Mexican Treaty delivery." <br /> <br />(Letter of January 16, 1986 to the Honorable Donald Paul Hodel, Secretary of <br /> <br />the Department of the Interior, from Gerald R. Zimmerman, Executive Director <br /> <br />of the Upper Colorado River Commission.) <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The need for an operating criteria was apparent even before congres- <br /> <br />sional authorization of the Upper Basin storage projects. In 1923 Herbert <br /> <br />Hoover, Chairman, Colorado River Commission, responded to one of a series of <br /> <br />questions on the Colorado River Compact as follows: <br /> <br />Question 14: Can paragraph (d) of Article III be construed to <br />mean that the States of the upper division may withhold all except <br />75,000,000 acre-feet of water within any period of 10 years and thus <br />not only secure the amount to which they are entitled under the <br />apportionment made in paragraph (a) but also the entire unappor- <br />tioned surplus waters of the Colorado River? <br /> <br />No. Paragraph (a) of Article III apportions to the Upper <br />Basin 7,500,000 acre-feet per annum. Paragraph (c) of Article III <br />provides that the States of the upper division shall not withhold <br />water that cannot be beneficially used. Paragraphs (f) and (g) of <br />this article specifically leave to further apportionment water now <br />unapportioned. There is, therefore, no possibility of construing <br />paragraph (d) of this article as suggested. (Extension of remarks <br />of Honorable Carl Hayden in House of Representatives Tuesday, <br />January 30, 1923 Congressional Record, beginning on page 2710.) <br /> <br />The Upper Colorado River Commission responded to the same question in a <br /> <br />September 21, 1959 resolution, which states in part: <br /> <br />The states of the upper division have the right to have <br />impounded in Glen Canyon Reservoir all the waters of the Colorado <br />River flowing into it, except waters required by the Colorado River <br />Compact to pass Lee Ferry. It is the right and duty of the Upper <br />Colorado River Commission to insist that the agencies of the United <br />States which perform the ministerial duty of administration of Glen <br />Canyon Reservoir should fill it to capacity as expeditiously as the <br />flow of the river will permit without infringement on the rights of <br />upstream or downstream users as recognized or established by the <br />Colorado River Compact. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.