Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />,~I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />,1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Table 2 <br />COST AND BENEFIT DATA <br />MOUNT CARBON PROJECT <br />WITH OITIMUM RECREATION PIAN <br />(in $1,000) <br /> <br /> Plan Including Additional Costs <br /> RecOllllllended Optimum Recreation and Benefits Over <br />Item Plan Development Recommended Plan <br /> $29,800.0 I $2,817.0 <br />First Cost $32,617.0- <br />Interest during constr. 1,937,.0 2 120.0' 183.0 <br />Total investment $31,737.0 ~(j(.o $3,000.0 <br />Annual Charges, i .. 3-1/4~ 3q,8~~'1_'f r,~ C4CH'J. "1'1,u~,s. <br /> c. #PI:. <br />Interest & Amortization $ 1,075.3 $ 1,176.9 $ 101.6 <br />Oper., Maint., & Rep1. llo.6 235.0 124.4 <br />Total Annual Financial <br />Charges $ 1,185.9 $ 1,411.9 $ 226.0 <br />Economic Loss 7.6 ll.5 3.9 <br />Total Annual Economic <br />Charges $ 1,193.5 $ 1,423.4 $ 229.9 <br />Annual Benefits <br />Flood Control $ 2,412.0 $ 2,412.0 $ 0 <br />Recreation, Fish & <br />Wildlife 173.0 815.0 642.0 <br />Total Benefits $ 2,5l:l5.0 l 3,227.0 l 642.0 <br />B/c Ratio 2.2 2.3 2.8 <br /> <br />c. The cost allocations for the Mount Carbon project with <br />optimum recreation development are presented in table 3. The cost <br />allocations were computed by the Separable Costs - Remaining Benefits <br />method. Table 4 shows the specific and joint-use costs and table 5 <br />presents a summary of the cost allocations. The costs allocated to <br />recreation, in table 5, are distributed between general recreation <br />and fish and wildlife recreation in proportion to their respective <br />benefits. <br /> <br />11 <br />