Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />t <br />'i <br />~ i <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />i, <br /> <br />1 <br />I <br />I' <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY <br />OMAHA DIsrRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS <br />OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68102 <br /> <br />SUPPLEMENT TO INTERIM REPORT AND APPENDICES, <br />BEAR CREEK, COLORADO <br /> <br />MOUNT CARBON RESERVOIR WITH OPrIMUM <br />RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br />September 1967 <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />R!RPOSE <br /> <br />Following review of the Chief of Engineers' proposed report on <br />the Bear Creek basin, Colorado, the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation <br />recommended certain substantial modifications in the recreational <br />aspects of the dam and reservoir project recommended by the reporting <br />officers and concurred in by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and <br />Harbors. This supplement presents a discussion and evaluation of tbe <br />reccmmendations made by tbe Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. It swmnarizes <br />the project costs and benefits associated with such additional development, <br />and it provides cost allocations and cost-sbaring data. <br /> <br />2. DESCRIPrION OF PLAN OF IMPROVEMENT <br /> <br />a. Tbe reporting officers recommended a plan of improvement <br />consisting of a multiple-purpose dam and reservoir on Bear Creek, <br />approximately 8 miles upstream from the confluen~e of Bear Creek <br />and the South Platte River, at Denver, tbat would provide flood <br />protection for metropolitan ~nver and tbe rural reaches of tbe <br />South Plexte River downstream from Denver. The Division Engineer <br />recommended, as a potential maximum modification of the original <br />plan of development, a plan essentially equivalent to the alterna- <br />tive plan 5 presented in tbe basic report of tbe District Engineer. <br />Re~ommendation of the more costly alternative was based on the <br />probability that fOundation conditions unsuited to the original plan <br />might be revealed during advanced planning studies, wben more detailed <br />subsurface explorations would be undertaken. The recommended project, <br />tberefore, represents tbe maximum structure that might be required <br />under adverse foundation conditions. This would include an earthfill <br />dam 162 feet bigh, witb. a crest length of about 4,400 feet, and a <br />supplementary earthfill dike, with a beigbt of 50 feet and a crest <br />length of 2,700 feet, to tbe south of the main embankment. An earth~ <br />and rock-cut emergency spillway would be provided to insure the safety <br />of tbe structure. The reservoir would provide storage capacity of <br />74,750 acre-feet, of which 2,400 acre-feet would be for sediment reserve <br />and recreation, 26,000 acre-feet would be for flood control, and 46,350 <br />acre-feet would be for surcbarge storage. An ungated service outlet <br />would be provided for flood control releases, and a gated low-flow <br />outlet would be provided for release of streamflow requirements. <br />Pertinent data for the recommended project are presented in table 1. <br /> <br />7 <br />