Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1997 WATER SUPPLY ASSUMPTIONS <br /> <br />For 1997 operations, three reservoir unregulated inflow scenarios were developed and <br />analyzed and are labeled as probable maximum, most probable, and probable minimum. The <br />attached graphs show these inflow scenarios and associated release patterns, end of month <br />contents, and end of month elevations for each reservoir. <br /> <br />The National Weather Service Extended Streamflow Prediction (ESP) computer model was <br />employed to develop each of these inflow scenarios. This model uses current basin <br />conditions as well as historical data to predict the range of possible future streamflows. <br />Although there is a wide confidence band associated with streamflow forecasts made a year <br />in advance, the data are valuable in analyzing possible impacts on project uses and purposes. <br />Soil moisture conditions throughout much of the basin were maintained by the snowpack <br />that was experienced in early 1996, but became much drier after June from an extreme lack <br />of precipitation. Despite these conditions, the most probable inflow in water year 1997 is <br />expected to be near nonnal. Therefore, the magnitude of inflows in each of the three inflow <br />scenarios are near the historical upper decile, mean, and lower decile (10 percent exceedance, <br />SO percent exceedance, and 90 percent exceedance, respectively) for each reservoir for water <br />year 1997. The three inflow scenarios for Lake Powell are shown in Tables 2(a) and 2(b). <br /> <br />The volume of inflow resulting from these assumptions was used as input into Reclamation's <br />monthly reservoir simulation model. This model is used to plan reservoir operations for the <br />upcoming 24-month period. Projected water year 1997 inflow and October 1, 1996 reservoir <br />storage conditions were used as input to this model and monthly releases were adjuSted until <br />release and storage levels accomplished project purposes and priorities. <br /> <br />5 <br />