Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />C) <br />."') <br /> <br />tn <br />"... <br />(Xl <br /> <br />11lpine cov~r. was unabsorbed. <br /> <br />Mr..c. L. Forsling. formerly with the soil conservation service. has <br />made the fOllowing comments on .the general effects of vegetal cover <br />on runoff: <br /> <br />"Forest cover and other vegetation serves to regulate and control <br />watel' where it fclus. It is evident that land use practices have <br />greatly reduced the regulating characteristics of the vegetal cover.. <br /> <br />"The veliletal cover breaks the impact of rainfall. It intercepts pr',!- <br />cipitation, 'it cijsperseasoilmoisture by transpiration, it binds soil <br />against. erosion and it . holds moistllre by the blotter effect of a covel' . <br />of undecomposed or partially decomposed material. All these factOrs .1 <br />help disperse preci.pitation and thus d.ecrease runoff. <br /> <br />"Of greater influence in this respect is the effect of the Plant covel' ~d <br />more :especially the organic material at or near the surface in the ab- <br />sorption of water by the soil. The cover increases the infiltration ca- <br />pacitylU;ld water-holding capacity of the soil. It fllters the watel' before <br />entering the: soil and then helps to maintain .clear passageways for water <br />in the soil. It keeps water spread out over the surface andhindel'lJ sur- <br />faca now, thus giving the soil more of a chance to absorb water; it n';; <br />tards erosion and thus prevents the formation of gullies which would <br />iDor~se runoff. <br /> <br />''The effects of vegetal cover on runoff are attested by actual cases <br />which show that as much as 88% of the precipitation woUld rim (ill a <br />denuded area as compared to 11 a% from a forested area. " <br /> <br />Mr. Sherman M. Woodward, chief water control planning engineer for <br />T. V.A. says: "Activity of man increased the runoff of the Tennessee <br />River between 1867 IU;ld 1937 some 11%". <br /> <br />It is estimated that the runoff from the graaing lands might have in- <br />creased Z5% over what it was in a state of natllre when almost the <br />entire area was covered with dense growth of grass. <br /> <br />ESTIMATED INCREASED RUNOFF DllE TO DEPLETION <br />OF GRAZING LAND <br /> <br />The acreage in the Upper Colorado River Basin has been separated <br />as to. uee in a report, "The Colorado Rivdl'by the U. S. a. R., as <br />shown in the following table: <br /> <br />. -10- <br />