Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IIITDIIC I 'IDJICTID 'D'UL4TIDI <br />FDIIDULDII, L411111 41D <br />WILD CDUITIII <br /> <br />CD COLORADO STATE PLANNING OFFICE <br />PROJECTION - LOW <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />EXHIBIT m- I <br />800 <br /> <br />/ <br />I 70a <br />/ 1 700 <br />01 1 <br />1 I <br /> <br />1 10 <br />I I <br />, I ".- <br /> <br />600 <br /> <br />I "1:0 <br />~ I 1'43' <br />~' , <br />i::' " # <:)~~" <br />r. f~' ,::,"'; <br />~" <?><:J'; <br />O~ " <br />~<f. 1~'1J ,~ <br /> <br /><n <br />Q <br />!527 Z <br />500 ~ <br />::> <br />o <br />r <br />I- <br />400 I <br />Z <br />o <br />300 !;t <br />-J <br />::> <br />"- <br />o <br />200 "- <br /> <br />COLORADO STATE PLANNING OFFICE <br />PROJECTION - HIGH <br /> <br /> <br />o COUNTY PLANNING OFFICES <br />PROJECTIONS <br /> <br />'TO'TAL <br /> <br />WELD <br /> <br />/ ,.,.."i;" <br />/ ",,.,,~f(,.~ <br />/f(,.\}J" .....~\ <br />~ ", "CI- <br />, <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />1900 <br /> <br />1920 <br /> <br />LARIMER <br />/940 1960 <br /> <br />1980 <br /> <br />o <br />2000 <br /> <br />A review of data on M&I water consumption <br />in nine major communities in the study area <br />for the 1973-1974 period shows that the <br />present use is about 230 gallons per capita <br />per day (gal/per capita/d). This compares <br />with a national average of about 150 gal/per <br />capita/d. Johnstown, a highly industrialized <br />town in Weld County, used more than 600 <br />gal/per capita/d in 1959. Historically, the <br />per capita water use for municipal and <br />industrial purposes has been increasing, and <br />this trend is expected to continue in the <br />future. <br /> <br />The approximately 1,218,000 acre-feet of <br />surface and ground water shown on exhibit <br />IV.6 (Part IV) as the total supply available <br />within the study area is being stretched <br />severely in order to satisfy municipal, <br />industrial, and agricultural demands. <br /> <br />From the standpoint of municipal and <br />industrial use, water problems stem from <br />the rapidly expanding urban growth, <br />overappropriated streamflows, difficulties in <br />acquiring and developing new water rights, <br /> <br />inadequate upstream reservoir storage <br />capacity, and a need to consolidate existing <br />distribution systems. <br /> <br />Problems of irrigated agriculture along the <br />Front Range relate primarily to the growing <br />competition between agricultural water use <br />and other uses. Other interests, such as <br />municipal and industrial, fish and wildlife, <br />recreation, and environmental, are <br />beginning to look at all possible avenues for <br />acquiring irrigated lands and their water <br />rights as a means of satisfying their needs. <br />As a result, there is a growing concern about <br />the transfer of water from agricultural use <br />to other uses, the breakup of irrigated land <br />continuity as a result of random <br />development of urban tracts on previously <br />irrigated lands, and the change of stream <br />regimen and diminishing return flows. <br /> <br />Planners and local interests should consider <br />the desirability of preserving those lands <br />and water rights that are best suited for crop <br />production and for meeting the Nation's <br />needs for food and fiber and for improving <br />national economic efficiency. This becomes <br /> <br />111-2 <br /> <br />