Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6 <br /> <br />funding component of the Recovery Program. Additionally, Reclamation contributes <br />approximately $7 million annually for Capital Projects. However, to complete the actions <br />described in this project description it will require the cost sharing by non-Federal partners, <br />Capital Projects consist of construction of facilities and acquisition of land and water interests <br />required to recover the endangered fish, These recovery actions are described below and in the <br />most recent Recovery Action Plan (April 1,1999). The purpose of the Recovery Program and its <br />Recovery Action Plan is to recover the four listed fish species and provide a means to avoid the <br />likelihood of jeopardy and adverse modification of critical habitat for new and existing water <br />projects, Recovery actions within the Recovery Program fall under five elements: I) habitat <br />protection; 2) habitat development and maintenance; 3) native fish stocking; 4) nonnative fish <br />control; and 5) research, monitoring, and data management. Recovery (downlisting and delisting <br />under ESA) of the fish species is dependent upon implementation of Recovery Program elements <br />in the various river basins (USFWS 1987), Recovery in a single river would not achieve full <br />recovery of the species, rather full recovery is dependent on self-sustaining populations in various <br />locations as described in the Recovery Plans for each species (USFWS 1990a, 1990b, 1991, <br />1998). The Recovery Program" . , . is intended to go considerably beyond offsetting water <br />depletion impacts by providing for the full recovery of the four endangered fishes in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin, excluding the San Juan River Basin" (USFWS 1993), <br /> <br />Under the Recovery Program, the Recovery Program Director.s office annually sends a request to <br />all participants for recommended changes to the Recovery Program's Recovery Action Plan, <br />These changes include revised due dates, additions and deletions of recovery actions, additional <br />steps to complete a recovery action, or a change in the lead agency responsible for ensuring <br />completion of a recovery action item. Once the recommended changes are received, they are <br />consolidated and sent to the technical committees for review and recommendations, Justifications <br />for making the change are also provided, The Recovery Program's Management Committee then <br />prepares a recommendation for the Implementation Committee, based on input from the Program <br />Director's office and the technical committees, Final changes to the Recovery Action Plan require <br />consensus by all Implementation Committee members, If consensus is not reached on a proposed <br />change, the subject item in the Recovery Action Plan remains unchanged, The Implementation <br />Committee routinely makes changes to the schedule for completing recovery actions when the <br />delay is due to uncontrollable circumstances. <br /> <br />As described in the Federal action on page I, this biological opinion addresses certain <br />Reclamation operations and new and existing depletions, and treats as interrelated certain otl,J.er <br />depletions, <br /> <br />Existing depletions, as of September 30, 1995, have been estimated by modeling, Model results <br />show existing depletions to be approximately I-million acre-feet/year, This estimate is the <br />approximate average annual depletion value modeled for water years 1975 to 1991. The <br />minimum depletion value was approximately 877,000 acre-feet/year for 1983 and the maximum <br />was approximately 1,172,000 acre-feet/year for 1978, <br />