Laserfiche WebLink
<br />19 <br /> <br />bodies, Signing of the Recovery Agreement will indicate support for the implementation of <br />recovery actions identified in this opinion, and will provide immediate coverage to those water <br />users for incidental take, If water users choose not to sign a recovery agreement, they could not <br />rely on the Recovery Program for Endangered Species Act compliance. Reasonable and prudent <br />alternatives outside the Recovery Program would have to be developed. <br /> <br />Monetary charges for projects to fund Recovery Actions which choose to rely on the Recovery <br />Program will be assessed consistent with documents establishing the Recovery Program (USFWS <br />1987). Existing and future Reclamation projects remain exempt from the charge because they <br />contribute annually to the Recovery Program. All other new project proponents undergoing <br />individual section 7 consultations for depletions greater than 100 acre-feet/year are to pay the 1- <br />time charge. New projects pay 10 percent at the time Federal funds or authorizations are <br />obtained and the remainder prior to depletions occurring, Existing projects are to pay the charge <br />for new depletions which have occurred since January 22, 1988. As additional new depletions <br />occur from existing facilities that will have undergone section 7 in accordance with this biological <br />opinion, a depletion charge will be assessed and paid prior to the actual depletion. <br /> <br />The Service will continue to work with proponents of new water projects to minimize project <br />impacts and look for mutually agreeable opportunities to provide conditions that benefit the <br />endangered fishes, The Service intends to coordinate with the lead Federal Agency during the <br />National Environmental Policy Act process and conduct informal section 7 consultation, as <br />appropriate, This will reduce the likelihood of reinitiation of consultation on existing and other <br />new projects that precede the subject project. <br /> <br />STATUS OF THE SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT <br /> <br />Colorado Pikeminnow <br /> <br />Soecies/Critical Habitat Descriotion <br /> <br />The Colorado pikeminnow is the largest cyprinid fish (minnow family) native to North America <br />and it evolved as the main predator in the Colorado River system, It is an elongated pike-like fish <br />that during predevelopment times, may have grown as large as 6 feet in length and weighed nearly <br />100 pounds (Behnke and Benson 1983), Today, fish rarely exceed 3 feet in length or weigh more <br />than 18 pounds; such fish are estimated to be 45-55 years old (Osmundson et al. 1997). The <br />mouth of this species is large and nearly horizontal with long slender pharyngeal teeth (located in <br />the throat), adapted for grasping and holding prey. The diet of Colorado pikeminnow longer than <br />3 or 4 inches consists almost entirely of other fishes (Vanicek and Kramer 1969), Males become <br />sexually mature earlier and at a smaller size than do females, though all are mature by about age 7 <br />and 500 mm (20 inches) in length (Vanicek and Kramer 1969, Seethaler 1978, Hamman 1981), <br />Adults are strongly countershaded with a dark, olive back, and a white belly. Young are silvery <br />and usually have a dark, wedge-shaped spot at the base of the caudal fin, <br />