Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.-4 <br />co <br />I.'\J <br /> <br />.- <br />'-' <br /> <br />,;:: <br /> <br />i'; <br /> <br />0, <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />~r <br />~~~'-\~ <br /> <br />Improve High Elevation Runoff Collection <br /> <br />This alternative plan was to determine the amount of Hater that <br /> <br />. <br />could be potentially developed from high elevation runoff, The <br /> <br />av.erage runoff estimate from locations in the project area are as <br /> <br />follows: <br /> <br />Estimated Average Annual Water Supply <br />(Acre-Feet) <br /> <br />Intake <br />System <br /> <br />Gurley Canal <br />Cone Canal <br />Lilylands Canal <br />Hughes Canal <br /> <br />Currently <br />Developed <br /> <br />23,530 <br />3,720 <br />3,730 <br />4,000 <br /> <br />Remaining <br />Runoff <br /> <br />Average <br />Runoff <br /> <br />26,890 <br />4,250 <br />6,590 <br />11,750 <br /> <br />3,360 <br />530 <br />2,060 <br />7,750 <br /> <br />The limited high elevation runoff 'records indicate that the <br /> <br />present systems develop the maximum volume of runoff that can be <br /> <br />expected. <br /> <br />Conveyance losses in the Cone and Gurley intake systems account <br /> <br />for the majority of the water in the remaining runoff column, <br /> <br />The runoff developed by the Lilylandssystem is limited by the <br /> <br />size and location of the reservoir. This system could develop an <br /> <br />additional mean runoff of 2,000 acre-feet if the intake system was <br /> <br />adequate to handle the runoff flows, and sufficient storage was <br /> <br />available. <br /> <br />The Hughes system only develops 34 percent of its potential <br /> <br />runoff because it does not have a storage facility. The development <br /> <br />of an additional 6,000 acre-feet from this drainage also requires an <br /> <br />adequate intake system to handle the runoff flow, and an adequate <br /> <br />storage facility. <br /> <br />The cost of the required structures, to develop the additional <br /> <br />runoff in the above two systems, would far outweigh the benefits. <br /> <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />:1 <br /> <br />f ".:) <br />'- .:'::. ..~. <br />I. ,;!,,: <br />1 <br /> <br />j <br />i <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />1.1 <br />_"..'t <br />.~I <br />I?I <br />,l ,~:f <br />;I';f <br />'i~ <br />I <br /> <br />f <br />t <br />1 ~ <br />'I <br />II <br />I, <br />" <br />" <br />I"" I <br />, ",. -. -, ~ <br /> <br /><.;;; ~-" <br />'-.- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />.,i <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />i <br />'I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />