Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~~ U~-~~jO ~~.~ <br /> <br />l...t(J:I~~ - tlJlLIl,. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Purpose <br /> <br />This paper constitutes compliance with Section 104 <br />ofthe Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act <br />(Act), which requires the Secretaty oflnterior to <br />notify t~~~ppropriate eommittees of the Con;nss60 <br />days pnor to expendin, funds on modifications of <br />projects authorized by the Act. The Bureau of <br />Reclamation intencb to market water produced by <br />the Yuma DaaltiJIg Plant (YDP), as authorized by <br />the Act, to offset thec;oat olmalntalnillJ the plant in <br />ready reserve $latus and conserve wata' presently <br />being bypa.lSed 10 tbe Republic of Mexico (Mexico). <br /> <br />By marketing one-third ofYDP capacity, <br />Reclamation ..ill reduce fedetOll outlay. Marketin, <br />one.third ofYDP won't impair ~damation's ability <br />to satisfy the salinity requirements of Minute No. <br />242 with Mexico. <br /> <br />To make marketing of the YDP successful, <br />Reclamation requesu that Congress specifically <br />acknowledgc our need to operate the YDP with <br />advanced funds and the need to operate the YDP <br />with these funds even ifno budget authorization <br />exists. We also request Congress put an <br />appropriation ceiling in the budget which recognizes <br />the advanced funding from non. federal sources. <br /> <br />Why YDP Was Built <br /> <br />Hisrory of tile SlZliniry IUlle <br /> <br />The salinity problem with Mexico began in 1961 <br />when the Welhon-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage <br />District (WMIDD) sta"ed discharging saline Water <br /> <br />Imperial Dam and NIB Salinities Slnee 1941 <br />2500 <br /> <br />! 2000 <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />a ISOO <br />. <br />" <br />. <br />: 1000. <br />; <br />~ <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />." <br />2000 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />SO 70 eo <br />Yea... Dr R.cord <br /> <br />. NIB <br /> <br />@ Imperlll Oarn <br /> <br />z <br /> <br />r-."'.:l <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />from drainage welis (average salinity of 6,000 partS <br />per million {p/mD to the Gila Rivcr. The Gila Rivu <br />drains into the Colorado River upstream of thc <br />Nottherly International Bounduy (NIB) with <br />Mexico but downatream of all United States water <br />divenions. Allo, at this time Reclamation w;a.s filling <br />Lake Mead in anticipation of the completion of Glen <br />Canyon Dam, so Cleas deliveries to Mexico were <br />reduced and less water flowed down the Colorado <br />River to dilute the WMIDD return flows. As a rcsull <br />of these actions, the salinity levels in water delivered <br />to Maico at the NIB increased to, at times, mare <br />than 2000 plm (see cha", Imperial Dam a7Ui NIB <br />Sali7lws Si7les 1941). Mexico's objections to these <br />high salinity levels rcsulled in three successive <br />minutel ~o the Mexiam Watcr Treaty ofl944 to <br />resolve the salinity problem: Minutes 218, 241, and <br />242. Minute No. 242 W8.5 to be the .permanent and <br />definitive solution to the international problem of <br />salinity of the Colorado River,n and established water <br />quality criteria. The Minute requires that the <br />aVenlge annual salinity of water delivered to Mexico <br />at the NIB be within liS +/- 30 parts per million of <br />the average annual salinity of water arriving at <br />Imperial Dam. <br /> <br />The Act supplemented Minute No. 242.Thc purpose <br />of the Act was to provide measures to ensure the <br />salinity requirements of Minute No. 242 would be <br />met without adversely impacting the seven Colorado <br />River basin statcs, either in tCIIm of dollars or water <br />resources. The basin states consist of California, <br />Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, and <br />Wyoming. The Act authorized, among other things, <br />the reduction of irrigated acreage and improved <br />irrigation efficiencies in the WMIDD to reduce its <br />drainage return flows, construction of a bypasl drain <br />to the Gulf of California, lining of 49 miles of the <br />CoacheIla Canal, construction of a well field within <br />the S-mile zone along the Statc of Arizona's <br />Southerly Intemational Boundary with Mexico, and <br />construction of the YDP (see Yuma tlrea Offiu 3, ~SO...~ <br />Faci1irW Map). 13 a _.:> <br /> <br />Article 102(a) of me Act authorized the concrete 3.h I 2. cpo <br />lining of 49 miles ofthe Coachella Canal to allow the I <br />United States to temporarily offset the water lost by <br />implementing Minute No. 242. The Act authorized <br />the United States to bypass WMlDD drainage return <br />flows around Morelos Dam and replace those flows <br />with an equal volume of waters saved by lining the <br />Coachella Canal, approximately 132,000 acre-feet per <br />year (acre-Nyr). This allowed the United States to <br /> <br />M.iZrluM, YwlO4 DRalli", Pltull Walft"-1996 <br /> <br />00 <br />'~"':Io? <br />I'''' :> <br />rF <br />t-~g, <br />