My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01100
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:29:20 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:10:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.105.I
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Navajo-Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/11/2002
Title
Navajo Dam EIS-New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission Detailed Comments
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />under a 5000 cfs maximum release rate." following ".". <br /> <br />Line 684. Replace "considered" with "formulated". <br /> <br />Line 685. Replace "right" with "rights". <br /> <br />Lines 694-729. The lines should be deleted because the alternative to decommission and breach <br />Navajo Dam should be deleted from the DEIS. <br /> <br />Line 699. Ifkept, insert "low flows" preceding "during". <br /> <br />Line 700. lfkept, delete "flows". <br /> <br />Line 701. If kept, replace "very low flows" with "low flows substantially below 500 cfs". <br /> <br />Lines 702-729. Ifkept, replace the lines in entirety with: "Flow Recommendations. (new paragraph) <br />This alternative is considered unreasonable and impractical because it does not meet all the elements <br />of the purpose and need for the proposed action. The alternative would not support maintaining the <br />authorized purposes of the Navajo Unit. It would result in loss of reservoir storage needed to allow <br />contract water deliveries to the San Juan-Chama Project, the NIIP, and other contractors, and would <br />make it extraordinarily difficult, ifnot impossible, for the States of New Mexico and Colorado to <br />fully utilize their consumptive use apportionments under the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. <br />It also could precipitate expensive litigation of Indian versus non-Indian water rights in both States. <br />In addition, this alternative would result in the loss of the following benefits provided by Navajo <br />Dam and Reservoir: downstream flood control, reservoir and tailwater fisheries, reservoir and <br />downstream recreation, and hydropower generation. The concept of decommissioning or removing <br />the darn is beyond the scope of the proposed action." <br /> <br />Line 738. Replace "with" with ", and". <br /> <br />Line 739. Insert a comma following "mitigation", and replace "chapters III and" with "chapter". <br />Mitigation measures are not presented in the discussions ofresource impacts given in chapter III. <br /> <br />CHAPTER 1II" INTRODl lCTION SETTING, WATER RESOI JRCESfHYDROLOGY SECTIONS <br /> <br />Line 37. Insert "adverse impacts of Navajo Dam operations on" following "mitigate". <br /> <br />Line 43. Insert ", Colorado" following "Mexico". The San Juan River for a short length flows <br />through Colorado also. <br /> <br />Line 54. Replace "Reservoir" with "Dam". <br /> <br />Line 55. Replace the line in its entirety with: "near Farmington, New Mexico, flows". <br /> <br />Line 56. Delete "river continues", and replace "landmark" with "monument,". <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.