My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01089
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:29:17 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:09:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.500
Description
Glenwood-Dotsero Springs Unit - Salinity Control Projects
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/24/1982
Title
URS Final Report - Phase I - Saliity Investigation of Glenwood-Dotsero Springs Unit
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o::!" <br />- <br /> <br />r- <br />;~ ') <br /> <br />{...._I <br />,-"'"" <br />...... <br /> <br />the thermal, saline spring water was also a prime planning team <br />concern. Thus, the concept of developing the saline water as a resource <br />was uppermost in the development of the reformulated plans. <br /> <br />Some intermediate potential uses that were identified included highway <br />and building heating, fish and wildlife enhancement, solar ponds, fish <br />hatcheries, water-related recreation, and industrial usage. The BOR is <br />actively committed to pursuing intermediate usage of the thermal, <br />saline spring water through public and/or private developers of the <br />brine resource. <br /> <br />Similarly, the BOR ~s committed to investigating nonstructural <br />alternatives in the Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program. <br />However, the complexity of the natural, point-source problem identified <br />in the Glenwood-Dotsero Springs Study limited nonstructural <br />opportunities, No nonstructural alternative meeting the tests of <br />effectiveness, efficiency, completeness and acceptability was <br />identified by the public, the BOR, or the contractor. Likewise, the <br />"no action" alternative was neither effective nor acceptable in view of <br />the total CRWQI Program. <br /> <br />The thirty-three alternatives were compared and analyzed using the <br />parameters of effectiveness, completeness, efficiency <br />acceptability. These reviews by the BOR and the contractor <br />coupled with direct public recommendations. <br /> <br />four <br />and <br />were <br /> <br />From the final screening process, five candidate plans emerged for <br />renewed consideration of cost-effectiveness and environmental and <br />socioeconomic impacts at advanced appraisal level. The results <br />are presented in Tables ES-l, ES-2 and ES-3, These tables were used to <br />explain the five candidate plans to the public for their final plan <br />selection input, <br /> <br />v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.