Laserfiche WebLink
<br />....'_. --: <br />. <br /> <br />.. -' <br /> <br />indicates that through normal actions such as fencing, signing, routine patrols, and <br />interagency coordination, the alternatives, as presented, could be easily administered <br />with minimal impacts on visitor use, staffing and funding levels for each Agency involved. <br />For those alternatives involving expansion of the monument boundary, additional planning <br />would be required to assure appropriate access, determine development needs, and <br />provide effective information and orientation services. A general management plan would <br />be completed should the monument boundary be expanded. Should the area be <br />designated a National Conservation Area, the BLM would complete comparable plans for <br />management. <br /> <br />In cases where the boundary of the national monument is expanded, it is assumed that <br />existing, adjacent land uses will continue at the same levels and not be perceived as a <br />threat to the lands added to the monument. It is also assumed that should BLM make <br />significant changes in the management of adjacent lands, such actions will be preceded <br />by appropriate public involvement. <br /> <br />Each alternative boundary and the proposed management of the lands within must be <br />evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The matrix included in Appendix B was prepared to <br />simplify the comparison of the alternatives. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />In the following presentation of alternatives, Alternatives 1 and 2 represent additions to <br />Black Canyon of the Gunnison NM. The justification and formulation of these two <br />alternatives are based on the rationale as presented in the previous section, ANAL YSIS <br />OF SIGNIFICANCE. Alternative 3 represents two BLM management options. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE 1 <br /> <br />Description <br /> <br />This alternative provides for expanding the boundary of Black Canyon of the Gunnison <br />National Monument. The expansion as indicated in Figure 3 would be an increase of <br />25,170 acres, which would include approximately 627 acres of private land. The <br />expansion would bring the total monument acreage to 45,936. The expansion delineated <br />by section lines would extend from the west and northwest boundary of BLCA north to <br />State Highway 92. The boundary would include approximately 95 percent of the <br />Wilderness Study Area identified by BLM and sufficient lands either side of the WSA to <br />provide for adequate resource protection and visitor use. <br /> <br />Analysis of Alternative 1 <br /> <br />General. The NPS would manage all of the lands and portions of river corridors acquired. <br />This alternative would change the management concept of the area involved from one of <br /> <br />20 <br />