My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01056
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:29:08 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:07:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
2/13/1992
Author
Unknown
Title
Gunnison River Basin Planning Model - Existing Model Review
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />",.. -, ~ 0 3 <br />U -,j;J.j;J' <br /> <br />Description of Existing Model <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Aspinall operations are represented only by Blue Mesa storage and release policies; Morrow <br />POint and Cryslal reservoirs are assumed to operate as run-of.river facilities from a monthly perspective. <br />Blue Mesa is operated on a forecast basis in J.rluary through July and on a declining storage target basis <br />in AUllust through December. Blue Mesa storage rights, incorporating refill and net of inactive storage <br />are set a.t 952,202 af; no direct flow power tights are represented. A schedule of minimum power <br />releases, dependent on reservolr storage, is imposed. Additional storage releases are made lO suppon a <br />300 cfs minimum instrcam flow in the Black Canyon. <br /> <br />Modeling of Uncompahgre Project operations includes Taylor Park. storage and release, diver. <br />sion at tile Gunnison Tunnel, administration of the Taylor Park Exchange, and diversions and return <br />flows in the main Uncompahgre Yd.Uey canals. Taylor Park is operated on a forecast basis for March <br />through May and on an insueam Dow maintenance basiS in the other months. Gunnison Tunnel diver- <br />sions are as cOnlCmplaled wlth AB Latera.l hydropower development in place; total tunnel diversions un. <br />der the baseline scenario arc shown in Table B. 'llIe diversions in the various Project canals are con. <br />strained to be no more than canal capacities; diversions in excess of consumptive use under each canal <br />are routed as surface and subsurface return nows. The assumed capacities of the various Project <br />facilities represented in the model are listed in Table 9. <br /> <br />The 1976 Taylor Park Exchange agreement permits the exchange of storage W.d.ter bern-een <br />Taylor Park and Blue Mesa for the purpose of I1shery enhancement on the Taylor and Gunrtison Rivers. <br />The Exchange account parameters are monilored in the model and used ex oost to adjust allowable <br />Tunnel diversions downward where necessary; in the baseline scenario this adjustment was imposed in <br />1954 and 1977. <br /> <br />Silver Jack reservoir, on the Cimarron River, is the principal feature of the Bostwick Park Pro. <br />ject. Silver Jack is operated with 12,820 af of active storage on a fill and spill basis except for the months <br />of July through. Oct.ober I when operations arc based on declining storage targets. Diversions of direct <br />Dow and storage water are routed through the Cimarron Canal (up to a capacity of 145 cfs) to satisfy <br />municipal and agri4.:uhural demands in the Uncompahgre valley; the municipal demands are listed In <br />Table 10 and are based on the average yield of shares held by the Ciry of Montrose. Minimum flows of <br />15 cfs (wintcr) and 25 cfs (summer) are imposed below the Canal headgate. <br /> <br />Ridgway reservoir is operated on a forecast basis in January through July and on a declining <br />slorage tar gel basis in the remai.ning months. Releases are made to irrigation use on an as.needed basis <br />and to M&l use following a demand pattern derived from the Dallas Creek Definite Plan Report. The <br />Ridb'WaY M&l demand of 28, 100 af is assumed to be exerted just below the reservoir oUllet because the <br />precise location of the demand is yet unknown. <br /> <br />lhe Project 7 Water Authority obtains water supplies from the Cimarron Canal and from the <br />South Canal. DiverSIOns from the Cimarron are limited to the average yield of shares owned by the City <br />of Montrose. Diversions from the UVWUA's South Canal make up the remaining Project 7 demand, with <br />a like amount of water released for irrigation use from the M&I account in Ridgw.d.Y. Operations of both <br />the Cerra and Fairview reservoirs are represented in the model. <br /> <br />MODEL CAUBRATI0N <br /> <br />The model was calibrated allainS! historical data for the years 1979 through 198~. Comparisons <br />were made between historical gaged streamnows and reservoir contents and those predicted by the <br />model. Model parameters rdating to simulation of operating procedures and to calculation of relurn <br />flows were adjusted to a.chieve closer agreement between modeled and historical results. Graphical <br />comparisons and correlauons between hist.orical and modeled results were used to judge calibration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.