My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01056
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:29:08 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:07:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
2/13/1992
Author
Unknown
Title
Gunnison River Basin Planning Model - Existing Model Review
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Description of Existing Model <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />The minimum power release requirement was identified during the model calibration process <br />and subsequently verified by the USIlR Grand Junction office. The minimum is either a fiXed number or <br />is dctennincd by interpolation depending on reservoir contents. TIle contents and release ranges (all <br />expressed in acre-feel) used in this calculation are as follows: <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Contems <br /> <br />Release <br /> <br />0-200.000 <br />200,000-390.000 <br />390.000-900.0UO <br /> <br />o <br />24,000-33,000 <br />75,000 <br /> <br />Blue Mesa storage rights. incorporating refill and net of inactive storage are set at 952.202 af; no <br />direct flow power rIghts are represented. The subordination of the Blue Mesa storage right to in-basin <br />junior depletions is effected by solving the model network in [wo steps. In the first step. the Blue Mesa <br />rights are administered in their correct priority vis-a-vis all upstream rights; in the second step, releases <br />from Blue Mesa are constrained to equal their first~s(ep values and the portion of the network above the <br />Blue Mesa outlet is re~sol...ed with Blue Mesa storage set junior to aU upstream rights except those sup- <br />porting transbasin diversions (if any). This two.step process essentially re.allocates Blue Mesa storage to <br />any upstream in-basin juniors that might have been called out by that storage. <br /> <br />Uncompahgre Project <br /> <br />Modeling of Uncompahgre Project operations includes Taylor Park storage and release, diver. <br />sion at the Gunnison Tunnel, administration of the Taylor Park Exchange, and diversions and return <br />009.'5 in the main Uncompahgre Valley canals. Taylor Park releases are determined from a combination <br />of inflow forecasts, instrcam flow targets. and seasonal storage targets. Depending on the month, the <br />model calculates the release defined by each of these methods and imposes the maximum of these as the <br />required release; practically speaking, the forecast. based releases and the instream flow targets <br />detennine the Taylor Park release most of the time. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The objee<ive of the forecast.based release is to fill Taylor Park without spilling by the end of <br />July maintaining a relatively conSlam now regime below the reservoir. Forecast.based releases are only <br />computed for the months of March through June. The release is calculated usmg the following equa- <br />tion: <br /> <br />release = (forecast + contents. capacity)/monthsleft <br /> <br />forecast is the projected inOow from the current date through July <br />contents is the active contems of Taylor Park at the beginning of the current month <br />caoacity is the active capacity of Taylor Park(106.200 acre-feet) <br />monthsleft is the number of months from the current date through July <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />The instream flow targets are imposed in all months and mimic the CWCB instream flow decrees <br />for the Taylor River below the reservoir. During the months of October through April, the target is 50 <br />cfs (3000 afper month); during May through September. the tar!(etls 100 cfs (6000 afper month). <br /> <br />The seasonal storage targets for Taylor Park were derived during the model calibration process <br />in an attempt to obtam bcaer correspondl"ncl' betwel'n llbsl'rved and modeled reservoir contents. 111e <br />targets used in the model are stated in terms of acre-fcC't of active capacity as follows: <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.