Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Chapter I <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Purpose of Report <br />Since March of 1986 the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and the Soil <br />Conservation Service (SCS) have been working cooperatively to evaluate the <br />potential of constructing sprinkler irrigation systems within the study area <br />of the Price and San Rafael Rivers unit as a salinity control measure. In the <br />evaluation, appraisal level designs and cost estimates have been prepared for <br />76 independent pressure laterals and on-farm sprinkler systems. '!he cost per <br />ton of salt removed (cost effectiveness) was also determined for each of the <br />pressure lateral sprinkler systems. '!he cost effectiveness for these systems <br />ranges from $27 per ton to $216 per ton. Preliminary information presented to <br />the Salinity Forum Work Group in March 1986 indicated that the cost <br />effectiveness for the sample area considered (Ferron and Cottonwood Creek <br />areas) was $70 per ton. <br /> <br />Because of the wide range of cost effectiveness, Reclamation and the SCS have <br /> <br /> <br />prepared this report in an effort to receive input from the Salinity Forum <br /> <br /> <br />work Group as to what the cutoff point should be for the cost per ton of salt <br /> <br /> <br />removed. In determining where the cutoff should be made, Reclamation and the <br /> <br /> <br />SCS believe that there are two important considerations. First, the project <br /> <br /> <br />should be large enough to justify the effort required to obtain Congressional <br /> <br /> <br />authorization and NEPA compliance. Second, the cost effectiveness should be <br /> <br /> <br />low enough to give the project a fairly high priority for implementation. <br /> <br />I-I <br /> <br />l-\"-"~"9 <br />'--\...-.;;.,; " <br />