My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01045
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01045
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:29:04 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:07:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8277.500.10
Description
Price and San Rafael Basin Unit - Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/1/1987
Title
Status Report to the Colorado River Basic Salinity Control Forum Work Group
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />'. <br />I <br /> <br />Chapter IV <br />Development of Recommended plan <br /> <br />In the March 1986 report prepared for the Salinity Forum Work Group gravity <br />pressure sprinkler irrigation systems were evaluated for the Ferron Creek and <br />cottonwood Creek areas. In this evaluation all open canals and laterals would <br />be replaced with pressurized pipelines for sprinkler irrigation under a joint <br />agency project. Reclamation would have responsibility for design and <br />construction of the main off-farm conveyance system while the SCS would work <br />with local farmers to develop the on-farm sprinkler irrigation improvements. <br />Based on an estimated cost of $70 per ton of salt removed, the work group <br />recommended that both agencies continue to pursue a combined agency plan for <br />the entire project area. Since the system layouts for the Ferron and <br />Cottonwood areas consisted entirely of buried pipelines, it was assumed that <br />the distribution system would also be used to deliver winter stockwater and <br />thus eliminate seepage due to winter operation of canals. <br /> <br />As sprinkler system layouts for the various canal systems were prepared after <br /> <br /> <br />the 1986 evaluation, it soon became apparent that it would be too costly to <br /> <br /> <br />construct totally enclosed distribution systems with buried pipelines because <br /> <br /> <br />of the large distance between the points of diversion and the irrigated lands. <br /> <br /> <br />Consequently, system layouts were developed which used the existing open <br /> <br /> <br />canals for the main water conveyance facility with pressurized pipeline <br /> <br /> <br />laterals which would deliver the water to the farms for sprinkler irrigation. <br /> <br /> <br />A typical system layout and its associated costs are included in Appendix A. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure IV-l is a map of the project area. <br /> <br />IV-l <br /> <br />n . , .~ 6 f · <br />VJL i'i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.