Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ODnZ7Q <br /> <br /> <br />Step-by-Step Description of Session No.2 <br /> <br />A. Steps proposed by Mike Gross: <br /> <br />Mike labelled this approach the "Compare Scenarios Method, " as opposed to a special <br />utility which he called the "Augmentation Analysis Mode. " <br /> <br />1. Locate demand point. <br /> <br />4. Run baseline and save hydrographfor selected rights. <br /> <br /> <br />2, Build demand criteria/file. <br /> <br />3, Identify storage pool and reservoir operating criteria. <br /> <br />5. Create second baseline with new reservoir operating criteria. <br /> <br />6, Compare impacts at select locations and total. <br /> <br />Mike's notes included: Problems -- (1) Don't know whether impact is natural shortage. <br />(2) How to separate beneficiaries from non-beneficiaries. <br /> <br />;;', <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Steps proposed by Randy Seaholm: <br /> <br />/.s.: <br /> <br />,'.! <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Select Edit. (Objective is to set a designfiow at a specific node point, <br />hold it constant and then see how the system can be optimized to meet <br />that hydrograph. Therefore, the program must be able to define a flow <br />regime at a node point and hold it constant.) <br /> <br />;; <br /> <br />;:"1 <br /> <br />2.a. Input point hydrograph, or <br /> <br />2.b. Input contract release from Blue Mesa. <br /> <br /> <br />3. Select hydrology and demands. <br /> <br />4. Optimize constrained by water rights priorities and rules. <br /> <br />5. If bust, ability to change certain rules/priorities is required. <br /> <br />6. Outputs: <br /> <br />a. Contract release. <br /> <br /> <br />b. Replacement pool. <br /> <br />c. Calling right, amount, admin #, location (who <br />benefits) . <br /> <br /> <br />d. Flow at gages. <br /> <br />7, Compare input changes. <br /> <br />1.;>' <br /> <br />'" .).~.-.' <br /> <br />-~~-&'~-''''' <br /> <br />< ~~~,jil.:i;..L6._ ~ :,~~~jj <br />