Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />,-, <br /> <br />~.'~ <br />~ <br />(t) <br />Q';l <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />compared ro $478 million in 19.3 and <br />$603 million in 1952. The hannftJl effects <br />from drought and potential ecoriomic <br />disaster were, therefore, lessenedQyC~BT <br />Project deliveries. <br /> <br />1976-1977 . <br />Most recently, drought visit~d <br />northeastern Colorado during 19f6-1977. <br />Precipitation during the winter 0 <br />1976-1977 was only 48% of nonna on the <br />West Slope where the C-BT Project <br />collects most of its water, and 65% of <br />normal on the East Slope. The 1971 spring <br />runoff was only 50% of normal, wit~ many <br />streams and creeks drying up completely <br />later in the summer. ' <br />'Summer precipitation was not ~nough <br />to make up the tremendous deficit, ~nd by <br />August many reservoirs were bonel.dry. <br />Active storage in C~BT West Slotie <br />reservoirs at the end of the 19.77 wat~r year <br />was only 146,252 acre~feet of wate'r <br />compared to an average 341, 525 acr~~feet. <br />East Slope storage in the spring of 11978 <br />was a meager 15,506 acre~feet. Bocp were <br />all-time lows for the C-BT Project., The <br />resule was a cotal deficit of 253,800 <br />acre~feet of water within District <br />boundaries. <br />Colorado's economy shared the effects <br />of this drought. The skiing industry; <br />experienced a horrible winter in 19761 The <br />lack of snow meant fewer skiers. T~e <br />industry sold 2,3 million fewer ticke~s <br />resulting in a $78 million loss. The skiing <br />industry's troubles were a prelude to <br />upcoming shortages in northeastern ; <br />Colorado's water supplies. Municipal. <br />supplies suffered, forcing many cities!to <br />institute restrictive water use practic4s, <br />such as restricting on lawn watering. Many <br />also began to plan seriously for additl,onaI <br />storage. , <br />Agriculture was hit hard, and it coiIld <br />have been worse except for the I <br />supplemental water supplies from irriga~ion <br />projects, <br /> <br /> <br />.... Horsetooth Reservoir during the 1954 <br />drought. On north dam looking south. <br /> <br />..., Horsetooth Reservoir during the 1976 drought. <br /> <br /> <br />To assist agriculture through this <br />difficult period the C~ BT Project delivered <br />309.476 acre-feer of water during 1977. <br />This was only the third year in C':' BT <br />Project history that rhe near capacity <br />300, 000 acre~feet water delivery mark had <br />been reached. <br /> <br />Droughts Will Come Again <br />Drought is a natural, yet <br />unpredictable occurrence in Colorado <br />which can have severe consequences. <br />Droughts can last for just a year or two, or <br />up to a decade or more. Since the gold <br />rush, the average drought has lasted 2 to <br />3 years. <br />Coloradans must continue planning <br />for future dry periods by providing <br />sufficient storage so water can be captured <br />in wet years for use in dry years. It is an <br />historical fact that droughts will occur. The <br />C~BT Project has proven its value over <br />time by helping to alleviate the hannful <br />effects of drought, and it will continue to <br />provide security for the future. <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />