My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01020
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:28:54 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:06:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/29/1944
Author
Six States Committee
Title
A Statement by the 6 States Committee Supporting Ratification of the Proposed Treaty Between the United States and Mexico With Respect to the Waters of the Colorado, Tijuana,and Rio Grande Rivers
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Boundary and Water Commission as an autocratic and dic- <br />tatorial body possessing vast and unlimited powers. The <br />truth is that the general administration of the treaty is <br />confided to the International Boundary Commission created <br />under the treaty of 1889 with Mexico, which ever since <br />that date has been exercising powers and jurisdiction along <br />the Mexican boundary similar in all respects to those im- <br />posed upon it by the present treaty. Never have any <br />charges been leveled against that Commission that it acted <br />arbitrarily or in violation of the trust imposed upon it. The <br />best evidence of this is the fact that while it was originally <br />set up as a temporary body, it was made permanent by the <br />Convention of 1900. This Commission has carried to a <br />successful conclusion many enterprises of prime local, na- <br />tional and international importance along the Mexican <br />boundary. The treaty simply extends this jurisdiction to <br />supervision over the treaty provisions. It is quite apparent <br />that the discharge of international functions and obligations <br />must be in the hands of an international agency. and not <br />left to local interests. <br /> <br />In fact, the powers of the Commission and its National <br />Sections are narrowly circumscribed. In the first place they <br />are confined to the discharge of purely international func- <br />tions along the Mexican boundary, and its jurisdiction over <br />works is confined to those on or along the boundary which <br />are concerned exclusively with the discharge of treaty <br />functions. There is left to the interior agencies of the gov- <br />ernment the control and operation of those interior facilities <br />which are to be used only in part for the performance of <br />treaty functions. By the express terms of the treaty the <br />two governments exercise an absolute veto power over the <br />decisions of the Commission. Certain works necessary for <br />the execution of the treaty are specifically provided for, <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.