Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A Statement <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br /> <br />The undersigned Committee, representing six of the <br />states most vitally concerned with the water treaty with <br />Mexico, signed at Washington on February 3, 1944, and <br />now pending before the United States Senate for its advice <br />and consent.to ratification, unreservedly endorses the treaty <br />and. urges its ratification. Briefly stated, the reasons why <br />these six states are supporting the treaty are as follows: <br /> <br />Colorado River <br /> <br />1. The allocation of 1,500.000 acre feet of water an- <br />nually to Mexico is fair and equitable to both countries. <br /> <br />a. It is in accordance with treaty precedents, including <br />treaties to which the United States is a party. The numer- <br />ous international water treaties among the civilized nations <br />of the world are. based primarily upon the recognition of <br />existing nses and in most cases provision is made for ex- <br />pansion in both the upper and lower states within the limits <br />of the existing water supply. In 1943 Mexico used in excess <br />of 1,800,000 acre feet of water. The present treaty guar- <br />antees her only 1,500,000 acre feet per year, subject to <br />reduction in times of extraordinary drought. [Far from <br />permitting any expansion of uses in Mexico, therefore, if <br />the remaining supply is ultimately entirely used in the <br />United States, present Mexican uses will have to be cur- <br />tailed.] In the meantime, of the estimated average annual <br />undepleted runoff of something over 18,000,000 acre feet <br />of the Colorado River System at the boundary, about <br /> <br />3 <br />