Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Paragraph 7 sets forth the method ~7hereby minimum power <br />head (elevation 3,490) would be gained in Glen Canyon. The proposal <br />here is to acquire this storage at the earliest practicable time. <br />However, Lake Mead would not be drawn below the rated head of the <br />Hoover powerplant while acquiring this storage in Glen Canyon. This <br />is a significant point. If the rated head is maintained at Hoover, <br />then only the energy generation at Hoover is affected and not the <br />design capacity. <br /> <br />Paragraph 8 sets forth the principle that the powerplants <br />will be coordinated and integrated and states the general method <br />whereby this will be accomplished. At this time it is not entirely <br />clear whether the coordination and integration need be electrical in <br />addition to hydrologic. Decisions on possible electrical intertie <br />will need to be made later, following additional study. Only very <br />general plans can be set forth in advance. To obtain the greatest <br />practical amount of power and energy, the plants will have to be <br />operated on an annual basis as conditions occur, and there must be <br />therefore freedom to operate without being tied to a specific plan. <br />The proposal for coordinated and integrated operation is deliberately <br />tied to the provision for allowance. The corollary of a conclusion ; <br />to provide an allowance for computed deficiency is that the Secretary <br />exercises the discretion to operate in a reasonable manner as he <br />determines. <br /> <br />Paragraph 9. The decision to coordinate and integrate <br />necessarily eliminates secondary energy generation at Hoover. It <br />is conceivable of course that if a situation occurs where both res- <br />ervoirs are completely full and there happens to be an extremely high <br />runoff year, such that water would otherwise spill at Hoover, then <br />secondary energy as defined in the Boulder Canyon project general <br />regulations could be generated. <br /> <br />Paragraph 10 indicates the cutoff date of the filling cri- <br />teria, and permits earlier cutoff than given in paragraph 2 if such <br />action is warranted. This is desirable because it will likely be <br />possible to obtain full system firm power generation with less than <br />a full Glen Canyon. As soon as this becomes a fact it would be well <br />to close off the filling criteria. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Paragraph 11 is a notification that the flood control regu- <br />lations at Hoover Dam will be applied in full recognition of the <br />available capacity in the upstream reservoir. The effect of such <br />recognition is to diminish the space which must be held in Lake ~kad <br />for the catchment of floods. Such action would of course influence <br />cost allocations to be made under Sec. 6 of the Act of April 11, 1956. <br /> <br />Results of the Proposal <br /> <br />Analyses have been made to appraise the effect of applying <br />these principles and criteria. Any such appraisal can, of course, <br />only be indicative. However, the following results give some indi- <br />cation of the magnitude of deficiencies in Hoover generation which <br /> <br />7 <br />