|
<br />Thus, operation of the dam has reduced the natural range
<br />in the monthly median discharge by a factor of cight.
<br />Furthermore, because no post-dam months have median
<br />discharges less than 9,000 ft3/s, operation of the dam has
<br />biased all months of the year toward either the conveyance
<br />of sand through or the erosion of sand from Marble and
<br />upper Grand Canyons.
<br />Operation of Glen Canyon Dam for hydroelectric-
<br />power generation has increased the daily range in
<br />discharge by a factor of 15,8, with tbe post-dam median
<br />daily range in discharge, 8,580 ft3/s, actually exceeding
<br />the pre-dam median discharge, 7,980 ft3/s (figs_ 22A and
<br />25A), In addition, dam operations have increased the
<br />median daily range in discharge by a factor of 10,6 over
<br />the pre-dam decade with the largest daily range in
<br />discharge, the 1920s (fig. 25B), Because of this increased
<br />sub-daily variability in discharge, daily mean discharges
<br />arc not adequatc to characterize the hydrology of the post-
<br />dam river. Thus, the post-dam flow-duration curve
<br />computed ii-om daily mean discharges underestimates
<br />the duration of higher discharges and overestimates the
<br />duration oflower discharges (Jig, 31), Of the four post-
<br />dam decades, the I 970s had the greatest median daily
<br />range in discharge, 13,700 ft3/s, and the 1990s had the
<br />smallest median daily range in discharge, 4,940 ft3/s
<br />
<br />1,000,000
<br />
<br />o
<br />z
<br />o
<br />frl 100,000
<br />w
<br />~
<br />w
<br />~
<br />ID
<br />w
<br />~
<br />()
<br />~ 10,000
<br />()
<br />~
<br />w
<br />"
<br />~
<br /><(
<br />I
<br />~ 1,000
<br />6
<br />
<br />-- POST-DAM FLOW-DURATION CURVE COMPUTED
<br />FROM INSTANTANEOUS DISCHARGES
<br />
<br />- - POST-DAM FLOW-DURATION CURVE COMPUTED
<br />FROM DAILY MEAN DISCHARGES
<br />
<br />--
<br />
<br />
<br />.
<br />,r
<br />
<br />100
<br />o 10 ~ ~ ~ 50 00 m 00 00 100
<br />PERCENTAGE OF TIME EQUALED OR EXCEEDED
<br />
<br />Figure 31. Comparison of the post-dam flow-duration curve computed from
<br />instantaneous discharges with the post-dam flow-duration curve computed
<br />.from daily mean discharges.
<br />
<br />(fig. 32). The mcdian daily rangcs in discharge during the
<br />1960s and 1980s were intermediate to these values at
<br />8,840 ft3/s and 9,830 ft3/s, respectively, For comparison,
<br />the pre-dam median daily range in discharge was 542 ft3/s
<br />(fig. 32), As in the case of discharge, operation of Glen
<br />Canyon Dam has also eliminated the seasonality
<br />associated with the daily range in discharge (fig. 33),
<br />Operation of the dam for hydroelectric-power generation
<br />has increased the daily range in discharge during all but
<br />0, I percent of all days (fig. 34).
<br />Not only has operation of the dam greatly reduced
<br />the duration of lower discharges, it has eliminated low-
<br />discharge months (lig. 35), Prior to closure of the dam,
<br />minimum discharges could be lower than 5,000 ft3/s each
<br />month of the year (figs_ 30A and 35A), and maximum
<br />discharges could be lower than 9,000-10,000 ft3/s in
<br />several or more months each year (fig, 358), After 1965,
<br />discharges released fi-om the dam were not held lower
<br />than 9,000 ft3/s for more than I month until the summer of
<br />2000, when the discharge released irom the dam was held
<br />steady at 8,000 ft3/s from June through early September,
<br />
<br />100,000
<br />
<br />o
<br />z
<br />o
<br />()
<br />w
<br />w
<br />"
<br />~ 10,000
<br />~
<br />w
<br />w
<br />~
<br />()
<br />"
<br />~
<br />()
<br />~
<br />
<br />,.7:":::...::::::...:-
<br />\ ........h........
<br />\,~ - - - - - - - --
<br />'''-,
<br />
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />--
<br />
<br />...........
<br />"
<br />~.....
<br />....,
<br />....\
<br />\~
<br />-'\
<br />\.
<br />~.
<br />'\
<br />'l
<br />\
<br />
<br />'''-,
<br />
<br />"-,
<br />
<br />ill 1,000
<br />"
<br />"
<br /><(
<br />I
<br />()
<br />w
<br />6
<br />~
<br />w
<br />"
<br />z
<br /><(
<br />"
<br />,.
<br />~
<br />"
<br />o
<br />
<br />"-
<br />
<br />',--
<br />
<br />'--,
<br />
<br />',--
<br />
<br />'--
<br />
<br />w
<br />~
<br />~
<br />~
<br />z
<br /><(
<br />6
<br />w
<br />~
<br />
<br />100
<br />
<br />100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
<br />PERCENTAGE OF TIME EQUALED OR EXCEEDED
<br />
<br />EXPLANA liON
<br />
<br />-1960s (March 14, 1963-Decomber31, 1970)
<br />- -1970s (January 1, 1971-December 31, 1980)
<br />.............1980s (January 1, 1981-December31, 1990)
<br />1990s (January 1, 1991-Seplember 30, 2000)
<br />-----. PRE-DAM (May 8, 1921-March 12, 1963)
<br />
<br />Figure 32. Exceedance curves of the daily range in the discharge of the
<br />Colorado River at Lees Ferry for the four post-dam decades and the entire
<br />pre-dam period of record.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />
<br />50 Computation find Analysis of the Instantaneous-Discharge Record for the Colorado River at lees Ferrv. Arizona-May 8, 1921, through September 30, 2000
<br />
|