Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Thus, operation of the dam has reduced the natural range <br />in the monthly median discharge by a factor of cight. <br />Furthermore, because no post-dam months have median <br />discharges less than 9,000 ft3/s, operation of the dam has <br />biased all months of the year toward either the conveyance <br />of sand through or the erosion of sand from Marble and <br />upper Grand Canyons. <br />Operation of Glen Canyon Dam for hydroelectric- <br />power generation has increased the daily range in <br />discharge by a factor of 15,8, with tbe post-dam median <br />daily range in discharge, 8,580 ft3/s, actually exceeding <br />the pre-dam median discharge, 7,980 ft3/s (figs_ 22A and <br />25A), In addition, dam operations have increased the <br />median daily range in discharge by a factor of 10,6 over <br />the pre-dam decade with the largest daily range in <br />discharge, the 1920s (fig. 25B), Because of this increased <br />sub-daily variability in discharge, daily mean discharges <br />arc not adequatc to characterize the hydrology of the post- <br />dam river. Thus, the post-dam flow-duration curve <br />computed ii-om daily mean discharges underestimates <br />the duration of higher discharges and overestimates the <br />duration oflower discharges (Jig, 31), Of the four post- <br />dam decades, the I 970s had the greatest median daily <br />range in discharge, 13,700 ft3/s, and the 1990s had the <br />smallest median daily range in discharge, 4,940 ft3/s <br /> <br />1,000,000 <br /> <br />o <br />z <br />o <br />frl 100,000 <br />w <br />~ <br />w <br />~ <br />ID <br />w <br />~ <br />() <br />~ 10,000 <br />() <br />~ <br />w <br />" <br />~ <br /><( <br />I <br />~ 1,000 <br />6 <br /> <br />-- POST-DAM FLOW-DURATION CURVE COMPUTED <br />FROM INSTANTANEOUS DISCHARGES <br /> <br />- - POST-DAM FLOW-DURATION CURVE COMPUTED <br />FROM DAILY MEAN DISCHARGES <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />,r <br /> <br />100 <br />o 10 ~ ~ ~ 50 00 m 00 00 100 <br />PERCENTAGE OF TIME EQUALED OR EXCEEDED <br /> <br />Figure 31. Comparison of the post-dam flow-duration curve computed from <br />instantaneous discharges with the post-dam flow-duration curve computed <br />.from daily mean discharges. <br /> <br />(fig. 32). The mcdian daily rangcs in discharge during the <br />1960s and 1980s were intermediate to these values at <br />8,840 ft3/s and 9,830 ft3/s, respectively, For comparison, <br />the pre-dam median daily range in discharge was 542 ft3/s <br />(fig. 32), As in the case of discharge, operation of Glen <br />Canyon Dam has also eliminated the seasonality <br />associated with the daily range in discharge (fig. 33), <br />Operation of the dam for hydroelectric-power generation <br />has increased the daily range in discharge during all but <br />0, I percent of all days (fig. 34). <br />Not only has operation of the dam greatly reduced <br />the duration of lower discharges, it has eliminated low- <br />discharge months (lig. 35), Prior to closure of the dam, <br />minimum discharges could be lower than 5,000 ft3/s each <br />month of the year (figs_ 30A and 35A), and maximum <br />discharges could be lower than 9,000-10,000 ft3/s in <br />several or more months each year (fig, 358), After 1965, <br />discharges released fi-om the dam were not held lower <br />than 9,000 ft3/s for more than I month until the summer of <br />2000, when the discharge released irom the dam was held <br />steady at 8,000 ft3/s from June through early September, <br /> <br />100,000 <br /> <br />o <br />z <br />o <br />() <br />w <br />w <br />" <br />~ 10,000 <br />~ <br />w <br />w <br />~ <br />() <br />" <br />~ <br />() <br />~ <br /> <br />,.7:":::...::::::...:- <br />\ ........h........ <br />\,~ - - - - - - - -- <br />'''-, <br /> <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />........... <br />" <br />~..... <br />...., <br />....\ <br />\~ <br />-'\ <br />\. <br />~. <br />'\ <br />'l <br />\ <br /> <br />'''-, <br /> <br />"-, <br /> <br />ill 1,000 <br />" <br />" <br /><( <br />I <br />() <br />w <br />6 <br />~ <br />w <br />" <br />z <br /><( <br />" <br />,. <br />~ <br />" <br />o <br /> <br />"- <br /> <br />',-- <br /> <br />'--, <br /> <br />',-- <br /> <br />'-- <br /> <br />w <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />z <br /><( <br />6 <br />w <br />~ <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 <br />PERCENTAGE OF TIME EQUALED OR EXCEEDED <br /> <br />EXPLANA liON <br /> <br />-1960s (March 14, 1963-Decomber31, 1970) <br />- -1970s (January 1, 1971-December 31, 1980) <br />.............1980s (January 1, 1981-December31, 1990) <br />1990s (January 1, 1991-Seplember 30, 2000) <br />-----. PRE-DAM (May 8, 1921-March 12, 1963) <br /> <br />Figure 32. Exceedance curves of the daily range in the discharge of the <br />Colorado River at Lees Ferry for the four post-dam decades and the entire <br />pre-dam period of record. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />50 Computation find Analysis of the Instantaneous-Discharge Record for the Colorado River at lees Ferrv. Arizona-May 8, 1921, through September 30, 2000 <br />