Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The final step in the construction of the 1921-86 <br />continuous record of instantaneous discharge was quality <br />control; daily mean discharges were computed /i'om this <br />continuous time series of instantaneous discharge and <br />compared with the daily mean discharges previously <br />published by the USGS. All periods during which the <br />computed daily mean discharges deviated from the <br />published daily mean discharges by I percent or more for <br />more than several days were examined for errors, During <br />this process, the major digitizing errors were found and <br />corrected, In addition, errors in the published daily mean <br />discharge data were also identified. The most cornmon <br />type of error found was a transcription or copying error, <br />where either stage or discharge was incOlrectly written or <br />copied either on the graph or in the final records (fig. 19). <br />The record for days with substantial ice effects could not <br />always be corrected because the published daily mean <br />discharges on these days were actually based on the <br />record from the Grand Canyon gaging station. Therefore, <br />some disagreement still exists between the instantaneous <br />discharges in the continuous record and the published <br />daily mean discharges on days of extreme ice effect. <br />Appendix E contains a complete listing of the causes of all <br />disagreements greater than or equal to 5 percent between <br />the daily mean discharges computed from the continuous <br />record of instantaneous discharge and the published daily <br />mean discharges. <br />Average disagreement between the daily mean <br />discharges computed from the continuous record of <br />instantaneous discharge and the published daily mean <br />discharges was found to be only +0.055 percent for the <br />entire period from water year 1921 through water year <br />1986 (fig. 20). In fig. 20, percent disagreement is defined <br />as <br /> <br />100(Qcomp- Qpub) <br />Qpub <br />where Qcomp = the daily mean discharge computed from <br />the continuous record of instantaneous discharge and <br />Qpub = the daily mean discharge previously published by <br />the USGS. All days with disagreements greater than 5 <br />percent or less than -5 percent are either (1) days affected <br />by ice, or (2) days in error in the published record. <br />Disagreement increases slightly after the closure of Glen <br />Canyon Dam because the increased variability in <br /> <br />discharge within each day made it more difficult for the <br />USGS to compute daily mean discharges prior to the <br />availability of more advanced computers, <br /> <br />The Continuous Record of Instantaneous <br />Discharge for Water Years 1921-2000 <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />Following the computation and quality control of <br />the continuous record of instantaneous discharge for water <br />years 1921-86, these data were combined with 30- and <br />IS-minute stage and discharge data collected after <br />October I, 1986, to form a continuous record of the <br />instantaneous discharge of the Colorado River at Lees <br />Ferry from May 8, 1921, through September 30, 2000 <br />(fig. 21A), Also included in fig. 21A is the peak discharge <br />of the 1884 flood, the largest flood between] 884 and <br />1921 at Lees Ferry. Stage and discharge of the Colorado <br />River at Lees Ferry were recorded at discrete 30-minute <br />intervals between October I, 1986, and May 3], 1998, and <br />have been recorded at discrete IS-minute intervals since <br />June I, 1998. These post-October I, 1986, data were <br />previously and are currently available from the Arizona <br />District of the USGS, The resolution of the May 8, ]921, <br />through January ]8, ]923, part of the continuous record <br />(the period before installation of the Lees Ferry Gage with <br />its continuous stage recorder) is twice daily; the resolution <br />of the January ]9, 1923, through September 30, ]986, part <br />of the continuous record is approximately] 5-30 minutes. <br />The resolution of the October I, ] 986, through May 3]. <br />1998, part of the continuous record is 30 minutes; the <br />resolution of the June I, 1998, through September 30, <br />2000, part of the continuous record is ]5 minutes. The <br />entire record can be either requested from the USGS <br />Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center, <br />Flagstaff, Arizona, or obtained electronically at <br />http://www,gcllU'c,gov. <br />The daily range in the discharge of the <br />Colorado River at Lees Feny between May 8, ] 921, and <br />September 30, 2000, (fig, 21B) was computed from the <br />data in fig, 2]A, The largest daily range in discharge of <br />68,100 ft3/s occurred on September ]3,1927, during the <br />rising limb of the September 13, 1927, 125,000 ft3/s flood. <br />Most of the water in this flood originated within the San <br />Juan River Basin. <br /> <br />0223~ <br /> <br />Computation of the Continuous Record of Instantaneous Discharge at lees Ferry for Water Years 1921-2000 39 <br />