My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00979
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP00979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:28:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:04:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.A
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management-AMWG
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/3/2004
Author
USGS
Title
AMWG Meeting Attachments-March 3-4 2004-Computation and Analysis of the Instantaneous Discharge Record for the Colorado River at Lees Ferry-Arizona May 8 1921-Sep 30 2000
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />, <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />CABLE CAR <br /> <br />Figure 10. Discharge measurement being made by the U.S. Reclamation Service (the former name of the Bureau of Reclamation) on the morning of June <br />27, 1921, at the Yuma gaging station, near the peak of the June 1921 flood, At the time o!the phot09raph. measured discharge (based on the measured <br />surtace velocity and a coefficient of 0,9) was 182,000 cubIC feet per second. and stage was 31 feet Photo 'Yuma 1094' taken by the U,S, Bureau of <br />Reclamation, Source of this photograph: 1891-1937 Surtace Water Records File. Colorado River at Yuma, laguna Niguel Federal Records Center, <br />Accession No, 57.78.0006. Box 2 of 2. location No, MB053635. <br /> <br />The June 18 peak discharge of the 1921 flood at <br />Lees Feny can also be estimated on the basis of the <br />records from npstream gaging stations, Based on an <br />extrapolation of the stage-discharge rating curve above <br />40,000 ft3/s, the June 16, 1921, peak discharge at the <br />Colorado River near Fruita gaging station (fig, IA) was <br />estimated to be 81,100 ft3/s (Grover and others. 1922), <br />The June 17, 1921, peak discharge at the Green River <br />at Green River gaging station (fig, IA) was computed <br />to be 65,500 ft3/s (Grover and others, 1922), The stage- <br />discharge rating curve for the Green River at this site was <br />well defined by discharge measurements up to 70,000 ft3/s <br />(Grover and others, 1922), so 65,5(x) ft3/s was probably <br />an accurate value. <br />Although no gaging stations were operating <br />on the mainstem of the San Juan River during 1921, <br />gaging stations on two of the major tributaries, the <br />Animas and Florida Rivers, were used to estimate the <br /> <br />likely discharge contribution of the San Juan River to the <br />June 18. 1921. peak discharge at Lees Ferry (fig. IA). The <br />tirst decade of overlap between the Animas and Florida <br />River gaging stations with the near Bluff gaging station. <br />the most downstream gaging station on the San Juan <br />River, was 1928-37, DUling May through June in this <br />period. the combined daily mean discharge of the Anim'Ls <br />and the Florida Rivers accounted for about 40 percent of <br />the next day's discharge of the San Juan River at the <br />near Bluff gaging station (fig. II); thus, the daily mean <br />discharge of the San Juan River at the near Bluff gaging <br />station during May 1921 was estimated by multiplying <br />the combined previous day's discharge of the Animas <br />and Florida Rivers by a factor of2.5, On June 16, 1921, <br />the combined daily mean discharge of the Animas and <br />Florida Rivers was about 8,000 ft3/s. Thus, it is likely <br />that the San Juan River contributed about 20,000 ft3/s <br />to the June 18, 192], peak discharge at Lees Feny. <br /> <br />022<39 <br /> <br />Colorado River Floods at Lees Ferry 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.