Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Irrigation Management System <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It was determined early in the planning process that application of water <br /> <br />to the project should be limited such that deep percolation is minimized. <br /> <br /> <br />A primary reason is that installation of the subsurface (closed) drains can <br /> <br /> <br />be deferred longer with reduced deep percolation. The application of only <br /> <br /> <br />that water needed will reduce the amount of deep percolation and delay, or <br /> <br />possibly eliminate, need for these drains. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The annual cost for an irrigation management program was incorporated into <br /> <br />the project and included in the farm budgets at a cost of $5 per acre. The <br /> <br /> <br />local sponsors are aware of the need for this program and are in support of <br /> <br /> <br />it. The irrigation district will provide the irrigation management program <br /> <br /> <br />and assess the water users in a similar fashion to OM&R assessments. Water <br /> <br /> <br />applications will be quantified and soil moisture levels will be monitored. <br /> <br /> <br />Individual fields will be monitored for consumptive use and available soil <br /> <br /> <br />moisture. This process will optimize the use of irrigation water on the <br /> <br /> <br />project and keep operational and onfarm wastes to a minimum. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />If an irrigation management system were not used, the high efficiency <br /> <br /> <br />obtainable with this system would not be realized and drainage, pumping, <br /> <br /> <br />and project facility costs would be increased. These cost increases have <br /> <br /> <br />been estimated to be $5 to $20 per acre. If these efficiencies are not <br /> <br /> <br />obtained during peak use, some shortage will occur. In view of this, it is <br /> <br /> <br />incrementally feasible to include an irrigation management system as an <br /> <br /> <br />integral part of the project. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Project Water Requirements <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Crop Irrigation Requirement.--The crop irrigation requirement used in the <br /> <br /> <br />early formulation studies was developed by weighting climatic data from a <br /> <br /> <br />number of stations in the area. For the Planning Report, a new crop irri- <br /> <br /> <br />gation requirement (CIR) was computed using climate data from three <br /> <br /> <br />stations--Pickstown, Wagner, and Armour, South Dakota. The results of <br /> <br /> <br />these computations were compared and it was found that there was no signi- <br /> <br />ficant difference between the three stations. Since the record for the <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />29 <br />