Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br /> <br />i- <br /> <br />"t') <br />N <br /> <br />for gravity flows through Oak Ridge Tunnel. The pool could be con- <br />veniently increased to benefit recreation and fish and wildlife if desired. <br />The dam would be about 329 feet high with a crest length of 1,560 feet. <br />The streambed elevation of 7,155 feet is 235 feet higher than at the Lake <br />Avery site. An earthfi11 dam at Sawmill Mountain would have an estimated <br />embankment volume of 5,733,000 cubic yards, which is about 1.1 million <br />cubic yards more than the Lake Avery enlargement. Because of reservoir <br />basin topography, Sawmill Mountain Dam would be about 115 feet higher <br />than at Lake Avery for equivalent storage. Maximum physical storage <br />capability of the site (if needed) is about 79,000 acre-feet. Because <br />of the narrow reservoir basin at Sawmill Mountain, some of the construction <br />materials would probably have to be borrowed from other areas. The <br />construction of a concrete dam at this site might be warranted. An <br />artist's concept of the Sawmill Mountain Dam and Reservoir is shown on <br />the following page. <br /> <br />Most of the Sawmill Mountain Reservoir basin is in private ownership <br />with small areas of National Forest and National Resource Land in the <br />upper reaches. The bottom land along the stream is presently irrigated <br />pasture in long narrow tracts. The sides of the basin are relatively <br />steep and mostly brush covered with some groves of spruce and aspen on <br />north facing slopes. The entire area is used for livestock grazing and <br />wildlife habitat. <br /> <br />Based on a preliminary geologic examination of the area in 1966, no <br />serious geologic problems at the Sawmill Mountain site are anticipated. <br />On the abutments, shallow depths to bedrock are expected. Reconnaissance <br />field surveys revealed no existing landslides in the basin. <br /> <br />North Fork Feeder Conduit <br /> <br />In order to accommodate the Sawmill Mountain Reservoir with gravity <br />inflows, the North Fork Feeder Conduit would begin at a point on the North <br />Fork between Lost and Marvine Creeks. This point is about 3.7 miles up- <br />stream from the location intended under the Lake Avery Plan. An aerial <br />view of the proposed location is shown on page 8. <br /> <br />Because of possible icing problems, the North Fork diversion struc- <br />tures at the head of the feeder system has been redesigned to allow free <br />river flow and eliminate potential ice jams. Flows to be diverted would <br />be channeled into the pipeline intlet and flows for fishery and downstream <br />rights simply bypassed. <br /> <br />The North Fork Feeder Conduit would be made up of 4.5 miles of buried <br />concrete pipeline and the 4-mi1e long Bob Raley Tunnel. The location and <br />alignment of the tunnel is shown in the photo on page 8. In addition to <br />being the most economical conveyance, the tunnel should present fewer <br />environmental problems than the Lake Avery plan. It would avoid laying <br />a pipeline through a narrow valley section between Crooks Creek and Buford. <br />Another major advantage to this feeder system is that it wu1d be an a11- <br />gravity line, eliminating the need for the Avery Pumping Plant and the <br />associated annual energy cost. <br /> <br />6 <br />