Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BUREAU OF RECLAMA TIOM REPORT <br /> <br />irrigated and farmed as plort of units requiring supplemental _ter. <br />No presently undeveloped pasture class lands, however, are included <br />because of their relatively low value complored to their cost of <br />development. The 1,000 acres of Indian-owned lands are inc1u:led in the <br />project area since they are well suited to irrigation farming and could <br />readily be served from project facilities. Other arable lands covered <br />in the land classification survey would be excessively costly to develop <br />under present conditions. <br /> <br />The project lands lie on gently sloping terraces, benches, and <br />alluvial. fans in the long, narrow Florida River Valley and on the higher <br />Florida Mesa, a compl.ct area of gently rolling bench land. The natural <br />gradient over most of the land provides good external" drainage, and the <br />character of the soil and its depth to impervious shale permit good <br />internal drainage. Therefore, only a minor amount of artificial drain- <br />age 'tlCuld be necessary with project developmmt. The soils are rich in <br />mineral plant nutrients ani are generally low in organic matter and <br />nitrogen. They are fertile and predominantly free from excessive amounts <br />of soluble salts. <br /> <br />Allocations and Repayment <br /> <br />The project costs 'tlCuld be allocated to the various purposes of <br />the project as shown in the following tabulation. The costs allocated <br />to irrigation would be prorated to the Indian- and non-Indian-owned <br />lands in proportion to the amount of storage ani direct flow _ter they <br />'tlCuld receive from the project. <br /> <br />Construction <br />cost <br /> <br />Annual operation, <br />maintenance, and <br />replacement costs <br /> <br />Irrigation <br />. Indian <br />Non-Indian <br />Flood control <br />Fish and wildlife <br /> <br />$5,847,900 <br />(556,700) <br />(5,29l,.cD0) <br />173,200 <br />190.400 <br />$6,21l,5oo <br /> <br />$20 ,640 <br />(1,960) <br />(18,680) <br /> <br />500 <br />$21,140 <br /> <br />The allocations of construction costs made to fish and wildlife <br />and flood control represent the present value of estimated bmefits <br />from these purposes over a 100-year period with an interest rate of <br />2.5 percent. These allocations 'tlCuld be nonreimbursable in accordance <br />with present law. Special legislation would be required to make non- <br />reimbursable the share of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs <br />allocated to fish and wildlife conservation, and an appropriation of <br />funds to cover these costs would be required. <br /> <br />6 <br />