My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00913
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00913
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:28:27 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:01:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.600.60
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Basin Member State Info - Utah
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/7/1975
Title
Colorado Regional Assessment Study - Phase One Report for the National Commission on Water Quality - Part 2 of 2 -- Chapter VI - end
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
288
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />the Central Arizona Project in the event of shortage. 2l <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Compact Apportionment Among Upper Division States. <br /> <br />The upper <br /> <br />~ <br />o <br />00 <br />I-" <br /> <br />division states avoided litigation and reached agreement on a formula <br /> <br />for apportioning rights to the flow in their part of the basin. The Upper <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Colorado River Elasin Compact of 1948 allots to Arizona 50,000 acre-feet <br /> <br />per annum and, as to the balance of the annual consumptive use available <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />to the Upper Basin, apportions to Colorado, 51. 75 percent; New Mexico, <br /> <br />11.27 percent; Utah, 23 percent; and Wyoming, l4 percent. 2.2 The gross <br /> <br />amount of annual consumptive use allowable in the Upper Basin, against <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />which these percentages apply, has become less than 7.5 m. a. f. with <br /> <br />the downward revision of estimates of average river flow. Water avail- <br /> <br />able for Upper Basin consumptive use is now projected by the Bureau <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />of Reclamation to be from 6.5 to 5.8 m. a. f., the latter figure being a <br /> <br />"conservative hypothesis" used by the Elureau of Reclamation for plan- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ning purposes. <br /> <br />Reserved Rights for Indians. Indian tribes, regarded as quasi- <br /> <br />sovereigns under the law, nonetheless were not parties to either the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />interregional allocation of the 1922 Compact or the interstate allocation <br /> <br />of the 1948 Compact. Each of the compacts contains a negative declara- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />tion to the effect that Indian rights are outside the reach of the Interstate <br /> <br />accord.23 Each of the compacts also declares that the consumptive use <br /> <br />of water by native Americans is charged against the state in which the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />use is made. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.