Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />003\)d3 <br /> <br />TITLE: <br />DATE: <br />SPONSOR: <br /> <br />YELLOW JACKET PROJECT <br /> <br />April, 1972 <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br /> <br />OBJECTIVE: <br /> <br />Update the Bureau's 1968 feasibility report on the Yellow <br />Jacket Project and formulate a feasible plan for the <br />util i zati on of the basi n' s water supp1 i es for new <br />allocations of demand for Irrigation, Industrial, <br />Municipal, and Domestic water purposes. <br /> <br />SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS: <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF PROJECT PLANS <br /> <br />1968 1972 <br />REPORT REPORT <br />61,700 30,100 <br />55,500 71,500 <br />117,200 101,600 <br />46,700 80,300 <br />19,900 11 10,500 <br />3,700 3,700 <br />23,600 14, 000 <br /> <br />Project Water Supply (acre-feet/year) <br />Irrigation <br />Industrial, Municipal & Domestic <br />TOTAL <br />Depletion of Colorado River <br /> <br />Irrigation Service Area (acres) <br />Full Service Land <br />Supplemental Service Land <br />TOTAL <br /> <br />Project Features <br />Reservoirs and Capacity (acre-feet) <br />Ri pp1 e <br />Lost Park <br />Thornburgh <br />TOTAL CAPACITY <br /> <br />20,000 <br />24,500 <br />22,500 <br />67,000 <br /> <br />20,000 <br />24,500 <br />22,500 <br />67,000 <br /> <br />LENGTH <br />(miles) <br /> <br />INITIAL CAPACITY <br />(Second Feet) <br /> <br />Canal s <br />Yellow Jacket <br />Josephine Basin <br />Milk Creek <br /> <br />31 <br />36 <br />12 <br /> <br />360 <br />185 <br />90 <br /> <br />235 <br />135 <br />60 <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> <br />That the General P1 an be approved, that the Yellow Jacket Project be <br />authori zed for constructi on and operati on under Rec1 amati on Law, that the <br />potential water users make the necessary commitments for the water supply, <br />that the Fi sh and Wil d1 He and Recreati on functi ons be authori zed, and <br />that the Big Game Management Plan from the 1968 report be deleted. <br />