Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />M3tJD7 <br /> <br />TITLE: <br />DATE: <br />SPONSORS: <br /> <br />WHITE RIVER STUDY <br /> <br />December, 1983 <br /> <br />Yellow Jacket Water Conservancy District, Mobil Oil Company, <br />Cathedral Bluffs Shale Oil Company, Shell Oil Company, TOSCO <br />Corporation, Exxon Coal Resources, Inc., Phillips Petroleum <br />Company and Marathon Oil Company <br /> <br />Evaluate, at an appraisal level of detail, the engineering <br />feasi bil ity and cost of constructi ng such alternative storage, <br />diversion, and delivery facilities necessary to develop the <br />water rights being made available by the participating <br />organizations for industrial, agricultural, municipal, and <br />domestic uses in the Colorado portion of the White River Basin. <br /> <br />OBJECTIVE: <br /> <br />SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS: <br /> <br />o The total water demand of the White River Project was 137,000 acre-feet <br />per year, of which 35,000 was located in the upper basin in the vicinity <br />of Little Beaver Creek, and 102,000 was located in the lower basin in the <br />vicinity of Piceance Creek. <br /> <br />o A two-reservoir storage system utilizing the most senior and productive <br />water rights, made available by the participants, would maximize water <br />supply and meet the established demands. <br /> <br />o The most efficient and cost effective reservoirs include the Avery and <br />Warner Point sites in the upper basin and Powell Park and Mahogany sites <br />in the lower basin. The Avery and Powell Park combination appeared to be <br />best; however, costs were within 10 percent of next best alternatives. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> <br />o A coalition of potential water users should be continued to maintain and <br />expand the cooperative effort exhibited by the White River Study <br />participants. <br /> <br />o The Colorado Water Conservation Board should consider the findings of this <br />study and those of the Yellow Jacket Project Study in preparing the next <br />phase of State investigations in the White River Basin. <br /> <br />o The YJWCD should continue to examine the possibilities of expanding its <br />boundaries to include all potential water use areas. <br /> <br />o Additional engineering investigations, including detailed geologic <br />explorations, should be conducted at each of the four principal damsites <br />to firm up the designs and cost estimates for alternative plan comparisons. <br /> <br />o Baseline environmental data should be collected at each of the four <br />reservoir sites and at the major water diversion locations. <br /> <br />o Studi es of the White Ri ver Basi n shoul d be expanded to determi ne whi ch <br />reservoi r sites and associ ated water del i very systems woul d best provi de <br />all projected water uses in the basin. <br /> <br />o The potential water users in the basin should encourage the continuation <br />of state and federal evaluation of minimum instream flows and assess how <br />such minimum flows impact yields of water rights. <br /> <br />!;{ <br />