Laserfiche WebLink
<br />acceptable progr~m, the contractual penalty <br />provision of a t~n percent reduction in the amount <br />, <br /> <br />of power sold to ,a particular preference entity <br />offers a substantial incentive to develop a <br />commitment to conservation. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br />Western also be11eves that Congress has endorsed <br />its approach in encouragi ng conservation efforts <br />through contractual provisions, as opposed to <br />making conservation an allocation criterion. In <br />the course of debate on the floor of the House of <br />, <br /> <br />, ' <br />Representatives pn the Hoover Powerplant Act of <br />1984, a conservation amendment was offered by <br />Representative Udall of Arizona. 130 Congo Rec. <br />H3336-37 (May 3,1 1984). That conservation <br />i <br /> <br />amendment, whic~ would apply to all power sold by <br /> <br />, <br />Western, adopts ithe approach of striving for <br />conservation goals through contractual provisions <br />with a power allottee, with percentage reductions <br />'if pre-defined Qoals are not realized. Western <br />i <br /> <br />notes that this! amendment was adopted in reaction <br />to objections vQiced by the Environmental Defense <br />Fund that the Hoover bill did not have adequate <br />measures for conservation. 130 Congo Rec. H3337 <br />1 <br /> <br />(May 3, 1984). I Given the congressional passage of <br />I <br />, <br />, <br />affirmative leg~slation which recognizes the <br /> <br />76 <br />