My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00898
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00898
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:28:23 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:00:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Marketing
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/11/1984
Author
USDOI/WAPA
Title
Revised Proposed General Power Marketing Criteria and Allocation Criteria
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />contains a floor, but no explicit upper limit, on <br />what power rates should be charged for <br />hydropower. 43 U.S.C. section 485h(c). However, <br />the consistent policy of the United States has <br />been to charge the lowest possible rates <br />consistent with sound business principles for CRSP <br />power. A May 15, 1965, letter from the Secretary <br />of the Interior to Wayne Aspinall, the Chairman of <br />the House Committee on Interior and Insular <br />Affairs, explains the foundation for that policy: <br /> <br />The Colorado River Storage Project is a <br />Reclamation project, and Section 4 of the <br />Colorado River Storage project makes it <br />subject to all of the Federal reclamation <br />laws. A careful reading of those laws long <br />ago compelled us to the conclusion that the <br />Congress intended that power generated at <br />Reclamation projects be sold at the lowest <br />possible rate consistent with sound business <br />principles.. Although this requirement is not <br />found in the Reclamation laws in those <br />particular words, we believe it to be a sound <br />construction of congressional intent--a <br />construction that has, incidentally, been <br /> <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.