Laserfiche WebLink
<br />connection with the reclamation project.. And <br />I think the members of the committee will <br />agree that the mun i ci pa 1 i ti es and the <br />organizations enumerated here should be given <br />i <br /> <br />protection. : <br /> <br />Reclamation Project Act of 1939: Hearings on <br />H.R. 6773 and H.R. 6984 Before the House <br />Committee on Irrigation and Reclamation, 76th <br />Cong., 1st $ess. 122 (1939). <br /> <br />More evidence of the congressional understanding <br />of the effect of, the 1939 legislation can be found <br />in Congressman cfse's statement on the floor of <br /> <br />, <br />the House of Representati ves: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. CASE. There is all the difference in the <br /> <br />world betwe\m a clause permitti ng "preference <br />for the sa1ie of power to municipal purposes" <br />i <br />and a mandatory clause requiring "preference <br />to municipalities and other public <br />corporati ons and agenci es and cooperati ves" <br />in the sa1~ of that power. The net effect of <br />i <br />the amendm,nt is to change the bill from a <br />water-conservation measure to a <br /> <br />power-prom9tion measure. <br /> <br />22 <br />