Laserfiche WebLink
<br />established WAPA as the new power marketing <br />administration. The DOE Act did not change <br />the standards set by the Reclamation Project <br />Act of 1939 relating to the marketing of CRSP <br />power under section 9(c). <br /> <br />Among the unchanged standards under section 9(c), <br />of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 is the <br />preference clause. Thus, it is inaccurate to <br />argue that all judicial and administrative <br />authority on the preference clause question is <br />dated and no longer of value in the post-oil <br />embarg'o era. Several re 1 ati ve ly recent addi ti ons <br />to the body of authority recognizing the ongoing <br />validity of the preference clause exist. E.g., <br />Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District v. <br />Johnson, 686 F.2d 708, 711. (9th Cir. 1982), rev'd <br />on other grounds sub nom. Aluminum Co. of America <br />v. Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District, 52 <br />U.S.L.W. 4716 (June 5, 1984); City of Anaheim v. <br />Duncan, 658 F.2d 1326, 1328-29 (9th Cir. 1981); <br />Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Schlesinger, 515 <br />F. Supp. 653, 656 n.5 (M.D. Ga. 1981). <br /> <br />The request by UP&L on behalf of 143 cities, <br />counties, and towns within its service area, <br />referred to by UP&L as lithe applying municipa1- <br /> <br />17 <br />