My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00898
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00898
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:28:23 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:00:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Marketing
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/11/1984
Author
USDOI/WAPA
Title
Revised Proposed General Power Marketing Criteria and Allocation Criteria
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /><. <br /> <br />section/4 of the CRSP legislation explicitly <br />states that the Secretary, in the operation of the <br />CRSP storage units and participating projects, <br />shall be governed by the Federal reclamation <br />laws. If any doubt exists that the preference <br />provisions of reclamation law apply, that <br />reservation is extinguished by reference to the <br />storage project's legislative history. The House <br />Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs made its <br />intent clear in the following report language on <br />H.R. 4449, one of the bills which was introduced <br />to authorize the CRSP: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />...the committee considered writing into this <br />legislation a power preference provision similar to <br />those in existing reclamation law. Such a provision <br />was. not specifically written in because the <br />provisions in general reclamation law, including the <br />Reclamation Project Act of 1939 and the Flood <br />Contro 1 Act of 1944, wou 1 d be app 1 i cab 1 e to thi s <br />project...The committee wishes to make it clearly <br />understood that, although a power preference <br />provision is not specifically written into this <br />legislation, the committee supports the application <br />of existing power preference provisions to this <br />project. <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.