My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00897
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00897
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:28:23 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8410.300.60
Description
Basin Multistate Organizations - Missouri Basin States Association - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
11/8/1984
Author
MBSA
Title
The Issue of Indian Reserved Water Rights
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Court declined to review the case on June 18, 1984. The case had other <br /> <br />interesting aspects that will be reviewed later in this report. <br /> <br />2. Date of Priority <br /> <br />In Winters the U.S. Supreme Court established the date of the water right <br /> <br /> <br />reserved for the Fort Belknap Indian tribes as May I, 1888 n the date the <br /> <br /> <br />reservation was created by act of Congress. Indian reservations were created <br /> <br /> <br />both by treaty between tribes and the United Steltes, which were then ratified <br /> <br /> <br />by Congress, and also by Presidential executive order. Later, in Sheem v. U.S. <br /> <br /> <br />(273 F. 93; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 1921), Indian Welter rights on <br /> <br /> <br />reservations created by Presidential executive order were also held to have a <br /> <br /> <br />date of the reservation's creation. These rulings meant that the Indieln water <br /> <br /> <br />rights were senior to any rights subsequently granted by the states or their <br /> <br /> <br />territorial predecessors. Since the estelblishment of Indian reservations preceded <br /> <br /> <br />much non-Indian settlement in the West, few non-Indian water rights are senior <br /> <br /> <br />to Indi3l1 water rights. <br /> <br />Indians also sometimes argue that their water rights are aboriginal in <br /> <br /> <br />nature. That is, they date from ''time immemoriell" and "are inherent sovereign <br /> <br /> <br />rights deriving from aboriginal ownership of the entire North American <br /> <br /> <br />continent" (National Congress of American Indians, 1981). It follows then that <br /> <br /> <br />they also postulate it was they and not the United States who reserved water <br /> <br /> <br />for their own use and that these and rights to other natural resources "may <br /> <br /> <br />extend beyond reservation boundaries to ceded areas, to traditional sacred sites <br /> <br /> <br />or to usual and accustomed hunting, fishing and gathering places" (NCAI, 1981). <br /> <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.